Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Reacções à injustiça no trabalho

Impacto da crença no mundo justo, da justiça procedimental e da justiça distributiva

Bibliographic Data

ID14825852
AuthorsAna Rita Gago (Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, corresponding author), Isabel Correia (0000-0002-9982-280X, Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa)
Year2012
Volume28
Issue1
Pages59-70
Publication date2012-12-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAnálise Psicológica (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0870-8231 • E-ISSN: 1646-6020
PublisherISPA - Instituto Universitario (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.14417/ap.252
OpenAlexW2027352477
LanguagePT
References cited27

As pesquisas anteriores apontam a crença pessoal no mundo justo (CMJ) como um recurso que ajuda as pessoas a assimilarem as injustiças da sua vida e portanto, a reagirem menos negativamente face a estas. O presente estudo examinou o impacto da crença pessoal no mundo justo na relação entre a (in) justiça procedimental e distributiva e as reacções a acontecimentos problemáticos no contexto de trabalho. Concretamente, pretendeu-se avaliar se a CMJ moderava essa relação. Foi aplicado um questionário a 84 professores de vários níveis de ensino, com idades entre os 24 e os 56 anos em que se lhes pedia que se imaginassem numa situação de (in)justiça procedimental e distributiva. No geral, os resultados mostraram que perante a injustiça procedimental os participantes que têm alta CMJ reagem mais positivamente (com mais paciência) comparativamente com os que têm baixa CMJ. Contudo, os participantes com CMJ alta reagiram à injustiça procedimental mais negativamente (negligência e voz agressiva) comparativamente com aqueles que tinham baixa CMJ. As implicações teóricas e práticas desta pesquisa são discutidas

Humanities · Ethics in Business and Education · Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior · Philosophy · Psychology · Workplace Violence and Bullying

  • Procedural Justice

    John W Thibaut, Laurens Walker•Procedural Justice•1976

  • Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management

    Robert Folger, Russell Cropanzano•Organizational Justice and Human…•1998

  • The Belief in a Just World

    Open Access•Melvin J Lerner•The Belief in a Just World•1980

  • Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors

    Robert H Moorman•Journal of Applied Psychology•1991

  • Impact of Exchange Variables on Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Neglect

    Caryl E Rusbult, Dan Farrell et al.•Academy of Management Journal•1988

  • Voice and Justification

    Robert J Bies, D L Shapiro•Academy of Management Journal•1988

  • Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions.

    Robert Folger, Mary A Konovsky•Academy of Management Journal•1989

  • Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Neglect as Responses to Job Dissatisfaction

    Daniel Farrell•Academy of Management Journal•1983

  • Retaliation in the workplace

    Daniel P Skarlicki, Robert Folger•Journal of Applied Psychology•1997

  • Organizational Justice

    Open Access•Jerald Greenberg•Journal of Management•1990

  • Reactions to procedural injustice in payment distributions

    Jerald Greenberg•Journal of Applied Psychology•1987

  • The Justice Motive as a Personal Resource

    Open Access•Claudia Dalbert•Justice Motive As a Personal…•2001

  • Beliefs in a Just World and Reactions to Personal Deprivation

    Open Access•Carolyn L Hafer, James M Olson•Journal of Personality•1989

  • Employees' reactions to problematic events

    Open Access•Mariët Hagedoorn, Nico W Van Yperen et al.•Journal of Organizational Behavior•1999

  • Social and personal determinants of workplace aggression

    Open Access•Robert A Baron, Joel H Neuman et al.•Aggressive Behavior•1999

  • Non‐instrumental voice and extra‐role behaviour

    Open Access•Michael J Platow, Francesca Filardo et al.•European Journal of Social…•2006

  • Procedural and distributive justice

    Kees Van Den Bos, Riël Vermunt et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1997

  • Mediators of the Relation Between Beliefs in a Just World and Emotional Responses to Negative Outcomes

    Open Access•Carolyn L Hafer, Brenda L Correy•Social Justice Research•1999

  • Justiça organizacional

    Open Access•Arménio Rego•Psicologia•2014

  • An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions

    Joel Brockner, Batia M Wiesenfeld•Psychological Bulletin•1996

  • Towards an understanding of inequity

    J Stacy Adams•Journal of Abnormal & Social…•1963

  • Título não encontrado

    Open Access•Nico W Vanyperen, van Nico Yperen et al.•Social Justice Research•2000

  • Opening the Black Box Between Justice and Reactions to Unfavorable Outcomes in the Workplace

    Open Access•Mariët Hagedoorn, Bram P Buunk et al.•Social Justice Research•1998

  • The World is More Just for Me than Generally

    Open Access•Claudia Dalbert•Social Justice Research•1999

  • Beliefs in a Just World as a Buffer Against Anger

    Open Access•Claudia Dalbert•Social Justice Research•2002

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae