Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

What gets published and what doesn’t? Exploring optimal distinctiveness and diverse expectations in entrepreneurship articles

Bibliographic Data

ID14868359
AuthorsMarie Madeleine Meurer (0000-0001-7084-0396, Loyola University New Orleans, corresponding author), Maksim Belitski (0000-0002-9895-0105, Loyola University New Orleans), Christian Fisch (0000-0003-3609-7193, Loyola University New Orleans), A Roy Thurik (0000-0002-0242-6908, Loyola University New Orleans)
Year2024
Volume63
Issue3
Pages1139-1170
Publication date2024-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSmall Business Economics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0921-898X • E-ISSN: 1573-0913
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11187-023-00865-0
OpenAlexW4391913774
LanguageEN
References cited104

The field of entrepreneurship has seen remarkable growth, increasing the expectations of academic audiences. Articles need to balance novelty with rigorous methodology, theoretical contributions, social implications, and coherent argumentation to succeed in the publication process. However, navigating these varied and sometimes conflicting expectations to achieve optimal distinctiveness in academic narratives is challenging for authors. To explore how authors can achieve optimal distinctiveness amidst these complex expectations, we studied academic narratives and related editorial decisions of two leading entrepreneurship journals, Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice (ETP, 4,151 papers) and Small Business Economics Journal (SBEJ, 4,043 papers), using computer-aided text analysis. Our study debunks common assumptions about what makes a successful entrepreneurship paper, providing an empirical basis for understanding actual versus perceived publication requisites. Furthermore, we extend optimal distinctiveness theory by demonstrating that high distinctiveness is not uniformly advantageous, meeting numerous expectations is not necessarily beneficial, and clear language is crucial for complex narratives. Our study underscores that crafting narratives is more nuanced than traditionally believed

Economics · Entrepreneurship · Optimal distinctiveness theory · Political science · Positive economics · Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences · Family Business Performance and Succession · Law · Private Equity and Venture Capital · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Contextualizing Entrepreneurship Theory

    Open Access•Ted Baker, Friederike Welter•Contextualizing Entrepreneurship…•2020

  • Building Theory about Theory Building

    Kevin G Corley, Dennis A Gioia•Academy of Management Review•2011

  • The Field of Management's Devotion to Theory

    Donald C Hambrick•Academy of Management Journal•2007

  • Optimal distinctiveness

    Open Access•Eric Yanfei Zhao, Greg Fisher et al.•Strategic Management Journal•2017

  • Everyday Entrepreneurship—A Call for Entrepreneurship Research to Embrace Entrepreneurial Diversity

    Open Access•Friederike Welter, Ted Baker et al.•Entrepreneurship Theory and…•2017

  • The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research

    Open Access•Krau, Matthias Breier et al.•International Entrepreneurship…•2020

  • Topic Modeling in Management Research

    Timothy R Hannigan, Richard Franciscus Johannes Haans et al.•Academy of Management Annals•2019

  • What is the Eisenhardt Method, really?

    Open Access•Kathleen M Eisenhardt•Strategic Organization•2021

  • Construct Validation Using Computer-Aided Text Analysis (Cata)

    Open Access•Jeremy C Short, J Christian Broberg et al.•Organizational Research Methods•2010

  • Thinking about U

    Open Access•Richard Franciscus Johannes Haans, Constant Pieters et al.•Strategic Management Journal•2016

  • Cultural entrepreneurship

    Open Access•M Lounsbury, Mary Ann Glynn•Strategic Management Journal•2001

  • Contextualizing Entrepreneurship—Conceptual Challenges and Ways Forward

    Open Access•Friederike Welter•Entrepreneurship Theory and…•2011

  • Persuasion With Case Studies

    Nicolaj Siggelkow•Academy of Management Journal•2007

  • What You See Is What You Get? Enhancing Methodological Transparency in Management Research

    Herman Aguinis, Ravi S Ramani et al.•Academy of Management Annals•2018

  • When Small Words Foretell Academic Success

    Open Access•James W Pennebaker, Cindy K Chung et al.•PLoS ONE•2014

  • Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses

    Open Access•David Moher, Alessandro Liberati et al.•International Journal of Surgery•2010

  • Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research

    Open Access•Dennis A Gioia, Kevin G Corley et al.•Organizational Research Methods•2013

  • Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review

    Open Access•David Tranfield, David Denyer et al.•British Journal of Management•2003

  • Cultural Entrepreneurship

    Open Access•M Lounsbury, Mary Ann Glynn•Cultural Entrepreneurship•2019

  • Cultural transmission and persistence of entrepreneurship

    Open Access•Gonzalo Olcina, Elena M Tur et al.•Small Business Economics•2020

  • The impact of entrepreneurship research on other academic fields

    Open Access•A Roy Thurik, David B Audretsch et al.•Small Business Economics•2024

  • Publishing in Small Business Economics

    Open Access•David B Audretsch, Christina Guenther et al.•Small Business Economics•2022

  • The geography of initial coin offerings

    Open Access•Winifred Huang, Michele Meoli et al.•Small Business Economics•2020

  • Digital affordances

    Open Access•Marie Madeleine Meurer, Matthias Waldkirch et al.•Small Business Economics•2022

  • Entrepreneurial learning in online communities

    Open Access•Peter Kalum Schou, Eliane Bucher et al.•Small Business Economics•2022

  • Making contributions

    Open Access•Per Davidsson•Small Business Economics•2023

  • The Use and Added Value of Mixed Methods in Management Research

    Open Access•José F Molina‐Azorín•Journal of Mixed Methods Research•2010

  • Ways of constructing research questions

    Open Access•J Sandberg, Mats Alvesson•Organization•2010

  • Adapting computational text analysis to social science (and vice versa)

    Open Access•P Dimaggio•Big Data & Society•2015

  • Strategies for conducting elite interviews

    Open Access•William S Harvey•Qualitative Research•2011

  • Automated Text Analysis for Consumer Research

    Open Access•Ashlee Humphreys, Rebecca Jen-Hui Wang et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2018

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae