Welfare Cooperative Production of Community Care for ‘One Old and One Young’ in China
Practice, Dilemma, and Mutual Empowerment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14896002 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yunyue Yang (0000-0001-7682-6245, School of Government Nanjing University Nanjing Jiangsu China), Yan Li (0000-0001-6650-7726, School of Government Nanjing University Nanjing Jiangsu China, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Children & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0951-0605 • E-ISSN: 1099-0860 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/chso.70040 |
| OpenAlex | W7140779768 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 34 |
Many Chinese families are facing a caregiving crisis, where the spillover of risks causes internal family problems to evolve into broader social concerns. Since the community serves as the primary living environment, it acts as an optimal site to carry out caregiving activities. Based on a qualitative study in Northeast China, this article explores a welfare cooperative production model of community care for ‘one old and one young’. The findings indicate a rising demand for community care but with an insufficient supply, which has primarily resulted from family dysfunction where the double burden of overlapping needs for elderly and young care as well as work–family conflicts plunged families into caregiving crises, with risks spilling over into the community. However, constrained by limited autonomy and a lack of social trust, community care services encountered a bottleneck. The community in this study has searched out a welfare cooperative production model, including vertical empowerment and horizontal collaborative cooperation, which facilitates two key transitions: from government‐led governance to collaborative governance and from technical co‐production to value co‐creation. Nevertheless, in the later stages of cooperative production, the model faced issues of goal deviation and value co‐destruction, where the focus of teamwork shifted towards political propaganda, and the elderly care service station faced financial deficits. Moving forward, family‐centred care policies should be developed to achieve full life‐cycle development and enhance family resilience. Additionally, social work teams and digital technology should be introduced to empower the cooperative production and to ensure the stable provision of care services
Autonomy · Community development · Corporate governance · Empowerment · Government (linguistics · Production (economics · Social Welfare · Teamwork · Welfare · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving · Social Policy and Reform Studies
Collective Action and the Sustainability of Co-Production
Leisure activities and adolescent antisocial behavior
The Service Framework
Not always co‐creation
Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services
A descriptive model of the consumer co-production process
Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations
Citizens and co-production of welfare services
Defending Politics
Intergenerational communities
The politics of co-production
Depoliticisation
Realising the Potential of Co-production
Can We Identify Intergenerational Policy Regimes in Europe
What Adult Worker Model? A Critical Look at Recent Social Policy Reform in Europe from a Gender and Family Perspective
Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes
From Engagement to Co-production
Co-production and Service Quality
Between elderly parents and adult children
Personalization
Introducing 'Deviant' Social Work
Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction
Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Implementation Research
Beyond Engagement and Participation
Social care for disabled elderly women in urban China
Intergenerational Support to Aging Parents
Emerging Theories of Care Work
Care = organisation + physical labour + emotional labour
The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare states
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |