Our(?) Concept of Food or , They are Eating Their Pets
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14949536 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Niklas Forsberg (0000-0001-9129-5534, Centre for Ethics, Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies University of Pardubice Pardubice Czechia, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 1343-1356 |
| Publication date | 2025-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Journal of Philosophy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0966-8373 • E-ISSN: 1468-0378 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/ejop.70011 |
| OpenAlex | W4412844530 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 18 |
This article examines the idea that deep disagreements are best understood as rooted in conceptual differences rather than differences in judgments and opinions, by means of a reflection on the differences between a vegan and a meat eater. The aim is not to develop a new theory of “deep disagreement” but to gain clarity about one field in which agreement, even fruitful conversation, is hard to reach. This article shows how the exposure of conceptual differences can offer a way to move beyond this situation where positions have become fortified; but this requires a broad, praxis oriented, understanding of concepts and conceptual change
Biology · Posthumanist Ethics and Activism · Psychology · Food Science
Metaphysics as a guide to morals
Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics
Fixing Language
The Logic of Deep Disagreements
Philosophy and Animal Life
The Routledge Handbook of Social and Political Philosophy of Language
Forms of moral impossibility
Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics
Animal Ethics
Philosophical investigations
Deep Disagreement (Part 2)
Deep Disagreement (Part 1)
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |