A multilinguistic analysis of spelling among children with cochlear implants
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15017369 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nancy Quick (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Nancy A Quick (0000-0003-4800-3481, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, corresponding author), Melody Harrison (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Karen Erickson (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), KAREN A ERICKSON (0000-0002-4317-8533, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 41-53 |
| Publication date | 2018-09-12 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1081-4159 • E-ISSN: 1465-7325 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/deafed/eny029 |
| PMID | 30215769 |
| OpenAlex | W2891953762 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 44 |
This study examines the spelling of nine elementary school children with cochlear implants (CIs) who use spoken language, and compares their performance with children who have typical hearing and children who are hard of hearing (HH). Compared to children with typical hearing, children with CIs did not produce a significantly different percentage of misspelled words (p = 0.431, d = 0.38), but their spelling errors comprised significantly lower percentages of homophone substitutions (p = 0.019, r = 0.61) and legal vowel errors (p = 0.011, r = 0.61). Children with CIs and children who are HH did not produce a significantly different percentage of misspelled words (p = 0.521, d = 0.31) or a significantly different distribution of categorical spelling errors. Results suggest that children with CIs utilize similar linguistic strategies as their peers who are HH but different strategies than peers with typical hearing when attempting to spell unfamiliar words.
Audiology · Developmental psychology · Homophone · Linguistics · Spell · Spelling · Vowel · Hearing Impairment and Communication · Language Development and Disorders · Medicine · Psychology · Reading and Literacy Development
No Adjustments Are Needed for Multiple Comparisons
Defining phonological awareness and its relationship to early reading.
Learning To Read and Learning To Spell
Talking to Children Matters
Chapter 4 The Reading Process is Different for Different Orthographies
Some differences between English plural noun inflections and third singular verb inflections in the input
Predicting poor, average, and superior spellers in grades 1 to 6 from phonological, orthographic, and morphological, spelling, or reading composites
Phonological Awareness, Reading Skills, and Vocabulary Knowledge in Children Who Use Cochlear Implants
Acquisition of Tense Marking in English-Speaking Children with Cochlear Implants
Evaluating Phonological Processing Skills in Children With Prelingual Deafness Who Use Cochlear Implants
Reading and Spelling Abilities of Deaf Adolescents With Cochlear Implants and Hearing Aids
Comparing the Spelling and Reading Abilities of Students With Cochlear Implants and Students With Typical Hearing
Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data
Does Phoneme Awareness Training in Kindergarten Make a Difference in Early Word Recognition and Developmental Spelling
Growth in Phonological, Orthographic, and Morphological Awareness in Grades 1 to 6
| Highly cited | No |
|---|