Adolescents Are Young Adults, Not Immature Brains
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15029104 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David Moshman (University of Nebraska–Lincoln, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 171-174 |
| Publication date | 2011-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Applied Developmental Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1088-8691 • E-ISSN: 1532-480X |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10888691.2011.618098 |
| OpenAlex | W2047638498 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 24 |
When G. Stanley Hall (1904) wrote the first book on adolescence at the turn of the 20th century, he was describing a new cultural phenomenon that had emerged in the United States and other industrializing societies during the late 19th century. There had always been children, whether or not we theorized about them, but there had not always been adolescents. Of course, there have always been teenagers in the mathematical sense of persons who have reached the age of 13 years but not yet 20 years (and in the linguistic sense that these are the ‘‘teen’’ years in our counting scheme). But in most societies and cultural traditions teenagers were not a distinguishable group. Depending on gender they might be expected to work, marry, have children, or run a household. The Jewish Bar Mitzvah at age 13, for example, has for centuries marked entry into the adult community with full rights and responsibilities. Romeo’s Juliet was just 13 years old. Teens were young adults for most of history; there was no special category of teenagers or adolescents. Now that adolescents have been around for more than a century, however, we think they have been here forever. In fact, we theorize about them as if adolescence were a natural biological phenomenon associated with the teen years, and as if the psychological phenomena of adolescence were the predictable result of teen brains. Our thinking about adolescents, I suggest, is deeply flawed. In this guest editorial, expanding on previous publications (Moshman, 2011a, 2011b, 2011c), I identify five fallacies
Adolescent development · Cultural phenomenon · Developmental psychology · Epistemology · Phenomenon · Sociology · Anthropology · Child Development and Digital Technology · Early Childhood Education and Development · Philosophy · Psychology · Youth Development and Social Support
Adolescents, Media, and the Law
Teenage Sex and Pregnancy
Handbook of Research on Civic Engagement in Youth
Liberty
Handbook of Adolescent Psychology
Egocentrism in Adolescence
The Adolescent Brain
The Dynamic Systems Approach as Metatheory for Developmental Psychology
Adolescent Reasoning and Adolescent Rights
Adolescents and Their Teenage Brains
Taking Emergence Seriously
Handbook of Developmental Science, Behavior, and Genetics
Human Development and Political Violence
The adolescent brain
Judgments about Risk and Perceived Invulnerability in Adolescents and Young Adults
The Gift and the Trap
Is Jumping off the Roof Always a Bad Idea? A Rejoinder on Risk Taking and the Adolescent Brain
Does the Adolescent Brain Make Risk Taking Inevitable
Adolescent (in)vulnerability
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,13 |
| Citation span | 2011 - 2016 (6) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |