Care Workers and Managers’ Experiences of Implementing Infection Control Guidance in an Epidemic Context
A Qualitative Study in the South East of England, during the Covid-19 Prevaccination Era
Bibliographic Data
The national response to COVID-19 has had a severe impact on adult social care settings, with high mortality amongst people receiving and providing care in England. Care workers had to rapidly adapt to new infection control measures to protect themselves, their colleagues, and the people receiving care. Infection control in residential and domiciliary care is always complex, but COVID-19 infection control measures impacted exceptionally on care workers’ working and everyday lives. We undertook qualitative interviews with care workers and managers (n = 10) in residential and domiciliary care for older people in the Southeast England during the first wave of the pandemic to understand their experiences, solutions, and concerns to implement guidance in practice. Data were analysed using framework analysis, and the following eight themes were identified: (1) Increasing visibility and support for the sector; (2) the impact of negative messaging about the sector; (3) feelings of isolation; (4) accessibility and usability of guidance; (5) social care staff as agents in producing and sharing good practice; (6) managing expectations and the impact of conflicting messages in the media; (7) improving communication with hospitals; and (8) problems in the early pandemic. The findings reveal widespread concerns for the marginalisation of the sector in the policy response and the inadequacy of infection control guidance. Guidance would benefit from a better understanding of domiciliary and residential care settings. This might involve the following steps: (a) coproduction of guidance with adult social care stakeholders, including those in direct-care roles and (b) a shift away from a clinical model of infection control towards a more flexible approach that attends to the inherent variability of care settings
Context (archaeology) · Coproduction · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) · Health care · Infection control · Isolation (microbiology) · Pandemic · Political science · Psychiatry · Public relations · Qualitative research · Social distance · Social isolation · Sociology · Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes · Homelessness and Social Issues · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Nursing
Exploring the challenges faced by frontline workers in health and social care amid the Covid-19 pandemic
Semistructured interviewing in primary care research
Dementia care during Covid-19
Snowball Sampling
Qualitative research in health care
Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (Coreq)
Shedding the cobra effect
Beyond the control of the care home
“We don't do it for the money” … The scale and reasons of poverty-pay among frontline long-term care workers in England
Generating ‘good enough’ evidenc for co-production
Using internet video calls in qualitative (longitudinal) interviews
Covid ‐19 and care homes in England
The Careless Society—Dependency and Care Work in Capitalist Societies
Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies
Ethical Considerations for Qualitative Research Methods During the Covid-19 Pandemic and Other Emergency Situations
The safe hand
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |