Is consensus-seeking unique to humans? A selective review of animal group decision-making and its implications for (human) social psychology

Bibliographic Data

ID15087728
AuthorsTatsuya Kameda (0000-0002-6666-493X, Hokkaido University), Thomas Wisdom (Hokkaido University), Thomas N Wisdom (Hokkaido University), Wataru Toyokawa (0000-0001-8558-8568, Hokkaido University), Keigo Inukai (0000-0002-6948-6251, Hokkaido University)
Year2012
Volume15
Issue5
Pages673-689
Publication date2012-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGroup Processes & Intergroup Relations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1368-4302 • E-ISSN: 1461-7188
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1368430212451863
OpenAlexW2108874616
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited89

Recent research on animal behavior suggests that group decision-making may not be uniquely human. Based on Tinbergen’s (1963) “four questions,” this paper proposes that linking biological- and social-science approaches is important to a better understanding of human group decisions. Toward this end, we first review some recent findings on collective behavior by social insects (ants and honeybees in particular). We then argue that several fundamental processes (e.g., positive feedback, nonlinear responses to social frequency information, and use of quorums) commonly underlie human and non-human group decision-making under uncertainty, while key prerequisites for the emergence of collective intelligence may be more vulnerable to social nuances in human contexts. We sketch some future research directions to promote cross-fertilizations between the two fields

Collective intelligence · Epistemology · Knowledge management · Sketch · Social group · Social intelligence · Computer Science · Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation · Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior · Plant and animal studies · Psychology · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub