Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Robust Beauty of Majority Rules in Group Decisions

Bibliographic Data

ID5833355
AuthorsReid Hastie (University of Chicago), Tatsuya Kameda (0000-0002-6666-493X, Hokkaido University)
Year2005
Volume112
Issue2
Pages494-508
Publication date2005-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychological Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-295X • E-ISSN: 1939-1471
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1037/0033-295x.112.2.494
PMID15783295
OpenAlexW2103311328
LanguageEN
Citations received64
References cited65

How should groups make decisions? The authors provide an original evaluation of 9 group decision rules based on their adaptive success in a simulated test bed environment. When the adaptive success standard is applied, the majority and plurality rules fare quite well, performing at levels comparable to much more resource-demanding rules such as an individual judgment averaging rule. The plurality rule matches the computationally demanding Condorcet majority winner that is standard in evaluations of preferential choice. The authors also test the results from their theoretical analysis in a behavioral study of nominal human group decisions, and the essential findings are confirmed empirically. The conclusions of the present analysis support the popularity of majority and plurality rules in truth-seeking group decisions

Decision rule · Group Decision Making · Majority rule · Popularity · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Psychology of Social Influence

  • Conformity in nonhuman primates

    Open Access•Edwin J C Van Leeuwen, Daniel Benjamin Moritz Haun•Evolution and Human Behavior•2013

  • Judgment and Decision Making

    Open Access•Terry Connolly, Lisa D Ordóñez et al.•Handbook of Psychology, Second…•2012

  • Judgment and Decision Making

    Open Access•Adele Diederich, Jerome R Busemeyer•Handbook of Psychology, Second…•2012

  • Herd Behavior

    Open Access•Tatsuya Kameda, Reid Hastie•Emerging Trends in the Social and…•2015

  • Evolutionary Group Dynamics

    Open Access•Tatsuya Kameda, Mark Van Vugt et al.•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • Decision and Choice

    Open Access•Henrik Olsson, M Galesic•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • Advancing the Science of Collaborative Problem Solving

    Open Access•Arthur C Graesser, Stephen M Fiore et al.•Psychological Science in the…•2018

  • Optimally Interacting Minds

    Open Access•Bahador Bahrami, Karsten Olsen et al.•Science•2010

  • Evolutionary Game Model With Group Decision-Making in Signed Social Networks

    Open Access•Cunquan Qu, Chenlu Ji et al.•IEEE Transactions on Computational…•2023

  • Incomparability and Incommensurability in Choice

    Open Access•Lukasz Walasek, Gordon D A Brown•Perspectives on Psychological…•2024

  • Where power resides in committees

    Open Access•Georg D Granic, Ashley K Wagner et al.•The Leadership Quarterly•2021

  • Anger Expressions in Structured Decision-Making Groups and the Moderating Role of Recipient Gender

    Open Access•Jack H Zhang, William P Bottom•Group Decision and Negotiation•2026

  • Exploiting Meta-cognitive Features for a Machine-Learning-Based One-Shot Group-Decision Aggregation

    Open Access•Hilla Shinitzky, Dan Avraham et al.•Group Decision and Negotiation•2024

  • Identifying information friction in teacher professional development

    Ji Liu, Jiayuan Du•Journal of Education for Teaching…•2022

  • How Diverse Task Experience Affects Both Group and Subsequent Individual Performance

    Open Access•Sheli D Sillito Walker, Bryan L Bonner•Personality and Social Psychology…•2022

  • The Paradox of Interaction

    Open Access•Bei Yan, Lian Jian et al.•Communication Research•2021

  • Does discussion make crowds any wiser

    Open Access•Hugo Mercier, Nicolas Claidière•Cognition•2022

  • Maximizing as satisficing

    Open Access•Christin Schulze, Wolfgang Gaissmaier et al.•Cognition•2020

  • Rebellion Management Theory

    Joachim I Krueger•The American Journal of Psychology•2023

  • Simple Heuristics in a Social World

    Ralph Hertwig, Ulrich Hoffrage et al.•Social rationality•2012

  • Collective induction without cooperation? Learning and knowledge transfer in cooperative groups and competitive auctions

    Boris Maciejovsky, David V Budescu•Journal of Personality and Social…•2007

  • Conceptual Models for Marine and Freshwater Systems in Alaska

    Open Access•Suresh A Sethi, Tuula Hollmen•ARCTIC•2015

  • An Agent-Based Model of Collective Decision-Making

    Open Access•Dirk-Jan van Veen, Ravi S Kudesia et al.•IEEE Transactions on Computational…•2020

  • Integrating social and cognitive aspects of belief dynamics

    M Galesic, Henrik Olsson et al.•2020

  • Social deliberation systematically shifts resource allocation decisions by focusing on the fate of the least well-off

    Atsushi Ueshima, Hugo Mercier et al.•2020

  • Intuitions about the epistemic virtues of majority voting

    Hugo Mercier, Martin Dockendorff et al.•Thinking & Reasoning•2020

  • Utilizing simple cues to informational dependency

    Open Access•Hugo Mercier, Helena Miton•Evolution and Human Behavior•2019

  • Health Information Seeking Behaviors of Ethnically Diverse Adolescents

    Open Access•Anastasia Okoniewski, Young Ji Lee et al.•Journal of Immigrant and Minority…•2013

  • Individual Bias and Organizational Objectivity

    Open Access•Bo Xu, Renjing Liu et al.•Journal of Artificial Societies…•2014

  • How to Manage Individual Forgetting

    Open Access•Jie Yan, Renjing Liu et al.•Journal of Artificial Societies…•2019

  • Is consensus-seeking unique to humans? A selective review of animal group decision-making and its implications for (human) social psychology

    Open Access•Tatsuya Kameda, Thomas Wisdom et al.•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2012

  • How to achieve synergy in group decision making

    Stefan Schulz-Hardt, Stefan Schulz‐Hardt et al.•European Review of Social…•2012

  • Accentuation of bias in jury decision-making

    Open Access•M Takada, Koji Murata•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2013

  • Strategy Selection Versus Strategy Blending

    Open Access•Stefan M Herzog, Bettina von Helversen•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2016

  • Super‐Underweighting of Rare Events with Repeated Descriptive Summaries

    Open Access•Eldad Yechiam, Tim Rakow et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2014

  • The Effects of Differing Knowledge Transfer Strategies on Group Decision Making and Performance

    Open Access•Sheli D Sillito Walker, Bryan L Bonner•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2017

  • Prescribing Agreement Improves Judgments and Decisions

    Open Access•Pavel V Voinov, Günther Knoblich•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2024

  • Local Majority-with-inertia Rule Can Explain Global Consensus Dynamics in A Network Coordination Game

    Open Access•Felix Gaisbauer, Ariana Strandburg‐Peshkin et al.•Social Networks•2022

  • From intrapsychic to ecological theories in social psychology

    Open Access•Klaus Fiedler•European Journal of Social…•2014

  • Intra‐group interaction and the development of norms which promote inter‐group hostility

    Open Access•Laura G E Smith, Tom Postmes•European Journal of Social…•2009

  • Smartly following others

    Open Access•Jun Yin, Zikai Xu et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2024

  • To eat or not to be eaten?” Collective risk-monitoring in groups

    Open Access•Tatsuya Kameda, Ryo Tamura•Journal of Experimental Social…•2006

  • Social deliberation systematically shifts resource allocation decisions by focusing on the fate of the least well-off

    Open Access•Atsushi Ueshima, Hugo Mercier et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2020

  • Conditional legitimacy

    Open Access•Sveinung Arnesen, Troy Saghaug Broderstad et al.•European Union Politics•2019

  • Are Collectivistic Cultures More Prone to Rapid Transformation? Computational Models of Cross-Cultural Differences, Social Network Structure, Dynamic Social Influence, and Cultural Change

    Open Access•Michael Muthukrishna, Mark Schaller•Personality and Social Psychology…•2019

  • The First Cut is the Deepest

    Joachim I Krueger, Leonard J Chen•Social Cognition•2014

  • The wisdom of select crowds

    Albert E Mannes, Jack B Soll et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2014

  • The burden of social proof

    Robert J Maccoun•Psychological Review•2012

  • Social choice theory, social decision scheme theory, and group decision-making

    Open Access•Patrick R Laughlin•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2010

  • Naïve Groups Can Solve the Hidden-Profile Problem

    Open Access•Torsten Reimer, Andrea Reimer et al.•Human Communication Research•2010

  • The Development of Preschool Children's Use of the Majority Rule

    Open Access•Norbert Zmyj, Thomas Goll et al.•Social Development•2025

  • Intuitive Political Theory

    Open Access•Peter Descioli, Scott E Bokemper et al.•Political Psychology•2019

  • When Should Political Scientists Use the Self-Confirming Equilibrium Concept? Benefits, Costs, and an Application to Jury Theorems

    Open Access•Arthur Lupia, Adam Seth Levine et al.•Political Analysis•2010

  • Majority rules

    Open Access•Hugo Mercier, Olivier Morin•Evolutionary Human Sciences•2019

  • La complejidad de los procesos educativos en el aula de clases

    Open Access•Ariel Quezada, Enrique Canessa•Educar em Revista•2008

  • Heuristic Decision Making

    Gerd Gigerenzer, Wolfgang Gaissmaier•Annual Review of Psychology•2010

  • A problem in theory

    Open Access•Michael Muthukrishna, J Henrich•Nature Human Behaviour•2019

  • Social learning strategies regulate the wisdom and madness of interactive crowds

    Open Access•Wataru Toyokawa, Andrew Whalen et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2019

  • How large language models can reshape collective intelligence

    Open Access•Jason W Burton, Ezequiel Lopez-Lopez et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2024

  • Social learning strategies for matters of taste

    Open Access•Pantelis P Analytis, Daniel Barkoczi et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2018

  • Physically interacting individuals estimate the partner's goal to enhance their movements

    Open Access•Akihiko Takagi, Gowrishankar Ganesh et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2017

  • "Wisdom of crowds"? A decentralised election forecasting model that uses citizens' local expectations

    Open Access•Andreas Erwin Murr•Electoral Studies•2011

  • Vote expectations at the next level. Trying to predict vote shares in the 2013 German federal election by polling expectations

    Open Access•Christian Ganser, Patrick Riordan•Electoral Studies•2015

  • Intuitive Biases in Choice versus Estimation

    Joseph P Simmons, L D Nelson et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2011

  • Cost–benefit analysis of social/cultural learning in a nonstationary uncertain environment

    Open Access•Tatsuya Kameda, Daisuke Nakanishi•Evolution and Human Behavior•2002

  • Does social/cultural learning increase human adaptability?

    Open Access•Tatsuya Kameda, Daisuke Nakanishi•Evolution and Human Behavior•2003

  • Inside the Jury

    Reid Hastie, Steven D Penrod et al.•Inside the Jury•1983

  • The Adaptive Decision Maker

    Open Access•John W Payne, James R Bettman et al.•Adaptive Decision Maker•1993

  • Group Performance and Decision Making

    Norbert L Kerr, R Scott Tindale•Annual Review of Psychology•2004

  • A Possibility Theorem on Majority Decisions

    A Sen, Amartya K Sen•Econometrica•1966

  • Reasoning the fast and frugal way

    Gerd Gigerenzer, Daniel G Goldstein•Psychological Review•1996

  • Experience-weighted Attraction Learning in Normal Form Games

    Open Access•Colin Camerer, Colin F Camerer et al.•Econometrica•1999

  • Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology.

    Egon Brunswik•Psychological Review•1955

  • Social Choice and Individual Values

    Kenneth J Arrow, Eric S Maskin•Social Choice and Individual Values•2017

  • The Theory of Committees and Elections

    Open Access•Duncan Black, Georg Kunze•Theory of Committees and Elections•1986

  • Turtle hunting and tombstone opening

    Open Access•E A Smith, Rebecca L Bliege Bird•Evolution and Human Behavior•2000

  • A general concept of majority rule

    Open Access•Michel Regenwetter, A A J Marley et al.•Mathematical Social Sciences•2002

  • Jury Verdicts

    Rita J Simon, Michael J Saks•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1978

  • Social Choice and Individual Values

    I M D Little•Journal of Political Economy•1952

  • Undaunted Courage

    Albert Furtwangler, Stephen E Ambrose•Journal of American History•1996

  • Arrow's Theorem

    Robert Sugden, Alfred F Mackay•The Economic Journal•1981

  • Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks

    Open Access•Patrick R Laughlin, Alan L Ellis•Journal of Experimental Social…•1986

  • The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making

    Robyn M Dawes•American Psychologist•1979

  • Pooling of unshared information in group decision making

    Garold Stasser, William Titus•Journal of Personality and Social…•1985

  • Group decision and social interaction

    Janet Haggerty Davis, James H Davis•Psychological Review•1973

  • Emergency Decisions, Cultural-Selection Mechanics, and Group Selection [and Comments and Reply]

    Christopher Boehm, Christoph Antweiler et al.•Current Anthropology•1996

  • Social Choice Observed

    John R Chamberlin, Jerry L Cohen et al.•The Journal of Politics•1984

  • Who's Afraid of the Big Bad Cycle? Evidence from 36 Elections

    Open Access•L Feld, Scott L Feld et al.•Journal of Theoretical Politics•1992

  • Many hands make light the work

    Bibb Latane, Kimberly D Williams et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1979

  • The decision processes of 6- and 12-person mock juries assigned unanimous and two-thirds majority rules

    Janet Haggerty Davis, James H Davis et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1975

  • The Evolution of Conformist Transmission and the Emergence of Between-Group Differences

    Open Access•Joe Henrich, Robert Boyd•Evolution and Human Behavior•1998

  • Group versus individual performance

    Gayle W Hill•Psychological Bulletin•1982

  • The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors

    Verlin B Hinsz, R Scott Tindale et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1997

  • Proper analysis of the accuracy of group judgments

    Daniel Gigone, Reid Hastie•Psychological Bulletin•1997

  • Information Aggregation, Rationality, and the Condorcet Jury Theorem

    Open Access•David Austen-Smith, David Austen‐smith et al.•American Political Science Review•1996

  • An Experimental Study of Jury Decision Rules

    Open Access•Serena Guarnaschelli, Richard D Mckelvey et al.•American Political Science Review•2000

  • Rousseau's General Will

    Open Access•B Grofman, L Feld et al.•American Political Science Review•1988

  • Institutional Solutions to the N-Prisoners' Dilemma

    Open Access•John Orbell, John M Orbell et al.•American Political Science Review•1978

  • Convicting the Innocent

    Open Access•Timothy Feddersen, Wolfgang Pesendorfer•American Political Science Review•1998

  • Condorcet's Theory of Voting

    Open Access•H P Young•American Political Science Review•1988

Unique citing works64
Citations per year3,2
Citation span2006 - 2026 (21)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 63

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae