The association between food benefit online ordering and redemptions
Evidence from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15096009 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Junzhou Zhang (0000-0001-7049-1931, Montclair State University), Chuanyi Tang (0000-0002-7203-2664, Old Dominion University), Kayoung Park (0000-0003-3876-3364, Old Dominion University), Qi Zhang (0009-0000-5229-2496, Old Dominion University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | e147-e147 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Public Health Nutrition (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1368-9800 • E-ISSN: 1475-2727 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1368980025100931 |
| PMID | 40859428 |
| OpenAlex | W4413735137 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 30 |
Objective: To examine how the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) online food benefit ordering could influence WIC benefit redemptions. Design: A cross-sectional study. We compare the average redemption rates between online ordering early adopters and non-adopters among WIC customers before and after implementing WIC online ordering. A propensity score-weighted difference-in-difference model was used to estimate the coefficients. Setting: The Oklahoma WIC programme and a grocery store chain in Oklahoma. Participants: 12743 Oklahoma WIC households that had redeemed their food benefits at the grocery store chain in 2020. Results: WIC online ordering significantly positively affected redemption rates for eight of the fifteen food categories. For example, the difference-in-difference coefficients ( P –values) of these food categories were cheese or tofu (0·077, P P = 0·015). There were no significant changes in the redemption of fruits and vegetables (Coefficient = 0·031, P = 0·121). Conclusion: Adopting WIC online ordering was positively associated with benefit redemption rates among most food benefit categories. Our findings provide preliminary but important evidence regarding online food benefit redemption among low-income consumers
Association (psychology · Environmental health · Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations · Medicine · Psychology · Pediatrics
Using propensity scores in difference-in-differences models to estimate the effects of a policy change
Designing Difference in Difference Studies
From Nutrients to Nurturance
The Online Ordering Behaviors among Participants in the Oklahoma Women, Infants, and Children Program
What county-level factors influence Covid-19 incidence in the United States? Findings from the first wave of the pandemic
Nudging while online grocery shopping
The stigma of claiming benefits
| Highly cited | No |
|---|