Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Creating assessments as an active learning strategy

What are students’ perceptions? A mixed methods study

Bibliographic Data

ID15328183
AuthorsJoshua Kurtz (0000-0001-7528-1722, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA), Michael A Lourie (0000-0003-2462-9615, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA), Elizabeth Holman (0000-0001-6067-6721, University of Michigan), Elizabeth E Holman (Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA), Karri L Grob (0000-0002-9883-7743, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA), Seetha U Monrad (0000-0002-3374-2989, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume24
Issue1
Pages1630239-1630239
Publication date2019-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Education Online (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1087-2981 • E-ISSN: 1087-2981
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10872981.2019.1630239
PMID31248355
OpenAlexW2946335394
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited36

Background : Teaching students how to create assessments, such as those involving multiple-choice questions (MCQs), has the potential to be a useful active learning strategy. In order to optimize students' learning, it is essential to understand how they engage with such activities. Objective : To explore medical students' perceptions of how completing rigorous MCQ training and subsequently writing MCQs affects their learning. Design : In this mixed methods exploratory qualitative study, eighteen second-year medical students, trained in MCQ-writing best practices, collaboratively generated a question bank. Subsequently, the authors conducted focus groups with eight students to probe impressions of the process and the effect on learning. Responses partially informed a survey consisting of open-ended and Likert rating scale questions that the remaining ten students completed. Focus group and survey data from the eighteen participants were iteratively coded and categorized into themes related to perceptions of training and of collaborative MCQ writing. Results : Medical students felt that training in MCQ construction affected their appreciation for MCQ examinations and their test-taking strategy. They perceived that writing MCQs required more problem-solving and content-integration compared to their preferred study strategies. Specifically, generating plausible distractors required the most critical reasoning to make subtle distinctions between diagnoses and treatments. Additionally, collaborating with other students was beneficial in providing exposure to different learning and question-writing approaches. Conclusions : Completing MCQ-writing training increases appreciation for MCQ assessments. Writing MCQs requires medical students to make conceptual connections, distinguish between diagnostic and therapeutic options, and learn from colleagues, but requires extensive time and knowledge base

Active learning (machine learning · Exploratory research · Focus group · Likert scale · Mathematics education · Medical education · Multiple choice · Perception · Qualitative research · Test (biology · Computer Science · Education and Critical Thinking Development · Innovations in Medical Education · Medicine · Problem and Project Based Learning · Psychology

  • Exploring (Collaborative) Generation and Exploitation of Multiple Choice Questions

    Open Access•Heinrich Söbke•Education Sciences•2022

  • Approaches to Qualitative-Quantitative Methodological Triangulation

    Janice M Morse•Nursing Research•1991

  • Teaching Students to Generate Questions

    Open Access•Barak Rosenshine, Carla Meister et al.•Review of Educational Research•1996

  • Using student-generated questions for student-centred assessment

    Tracey Papinczak, Raymond Peterson et al.•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2012

  • Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research

    Open Access•R Burke Johnson, Anthony J Onwuegbuzie et al.•Journal of Mixed Methods Research•2007

  • A fair trial? Judging quality in qualitative research

    Bogusia Temple•International Journal of Social…•1998

  • Research Design

    Open Access•Atlanta Sloane-Seale•Canadian Journal of University…•2009

  • Learning From Distributed Theories of Intelligence

    Paul Cobb•Mind Culture and Activity•1998

  • Thinking and Speech and Protocol Analysis

    P Smagorinsky•Mind Culture and Activity•1998

  • Thematic Analysis

    Open Access•Lorelli Nowell, Jill M Norris et al.•International Journal of…•2017

  • Accounts of health and illness

    Open Access•Alan Radley, M Billig•Sociology of Health & Illness•1996

Citations per year0.25
Citation span2022 - 2022 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae