Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Use of Professionalism Scenarios in the Medical School Interview Process

Faculty and Interviewee Perceptions

Bibliographic Data

ID15328827
AuthorsJames Kleshinski (University of Toledo, corresponding author), Constance Shriner (University of Toledo), Sadik Khuder (0000-0003-2673-6326, University of Toledo), Sadik A Khuder
Year2008
Volume13
Issue1
Pages4472-4472
Publication date2008-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Education Online (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1087-2981 • E-ISSN: 1087-2981
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.3402/meo.v13i.4472
OpenAlexW4235195123
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited11

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of professionalism scenarios on the medicai school admissions process from applicant and faculty perspectives. Specifically, do completing professionalism scenarios as part of the medical school interview process have an impact on both the interviewee’s and the faculty’s perception of the process and outcome?Method: Ninety-one faculty interviewed 199 applicants from January 2007 through April 2007 at The University of Toledo College of Medicine. All applicants were asked one standard professionalism scenario in each of their two interviews. A total of six scenarios were used for the entire interviewing season in rotation every two months. A survey was administered by an admissions office staff member to both the interviewed applicants as well as faculty who conducted interviews about how these scenarios impacted their interview experience.Results: Asking applicants to respond to professionalism scenarios during the interview was described as having a positive influence on their interview experience. This was also associated with leaving an impression on the applicant about what our institution values in its students and contributed an element of personal reflection about what will be expected of them in the medical profession. Applicants more often reported that asking questions about professionalism was an important aspect of the interview than did faculty. Overall, there was an association between the interviewer’s perception of the applicant’s response and the interviewer’s assessment of professionalism.Conclusions: Professionalism scenarios can be a worthwhile tool for use in the admissions process. The interview process should encourage participation from faculty who value this as an important component in the evaluation of an applicant. Determinants of faculty perception of the role of assessing professionalism in the interview process should be investigated in future research

Interview · Medical education · Perception · Process (computing · Qualitative research · Semi-structured interview · Sociology · Diversity and Career in Medicine · Innovations in Medical Education · Medical Education and Admissions · Medicine · Psychology

  • How effective are selection methods in medical education? A systematic review

    Open Access•Fiona Patterson, Alec Knight et al.•Medical Education•2016

  • Beyond curriculum reform

    Frederic W Hafferty•Academic Medicine•1998

Citations per year0.1
Citation span2016 - 2016 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae