Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Environments, processes, and outcomes - using the Lepo framework to examine medical student learning preferences with traditional and electronic resources

Bibliographic Data

ID15328899
AuthorsKristin Wong (0000-0002-1568-5757, Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA, corresponding author), Vidhi Kapoor (University of Washington), Alan Tso (Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA), Mary O’connor (0000-0002-1096-3340, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School), David Convissar (0000-0001-7757-5337, Harvard University), Neil Kothari (0000-0002-5040-0868, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School), Christin Traba (0000-0001-6367-297X, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School)
Year2021
Volume26
Issue1
Pages1876316-1876316
Publication date2021-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Education Online (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1087-2981 • E-ISSN: 1087-2981
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10872981.2021.1876316
PMID33499778
OpenAlexW3121785451
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited11

Changes in medical student learning preferences help drive innovation in teaching and require schools and commercial resources to quickly adapt. However, few studies have detailed the relationship of learner preferences to the environment and teaching modalities used in the pre-clerkship years, nor do they incorporate third-party resources. Our study attempts to analyze learner preferences by comparing the use of traditional and third-party resources. In 2017-18, a survey was distributed to medical students and residents at two accredited medical schools. Participants noted preferred styles of learning regarding lecture duration, timing, location, format, third-party resources, learner types and USMLE Step 1 scores. The 'Learning Environment, Learning Processes, and Learning Outcomes' (LEPO) framework [5] was used to examine learner preferences, with responses compared using the Mann-Whitney U and two proportion z-tests. A total of 329 respondents completed the survey: 62.7% medical students and 37.3% residents. The majority of participants identified their learning style by Kolb [6] as converging (33.0%) or accommodating (39.2%). Students preferred lectures 30-40 minutes long (43.3%), during morning hours (54.2%), in their own homes (52.0%), via online lectures with simultaneous drawings (56.0%), and classroom/podcast lectures with PowerPoint® presentations (54.3%). Overall, students rated third-party resource characteristics higher than traditional curricula, including effectiveness of teachers, length, quality, time of day, and venue (p < 0.001), but also preferred small group formats. Students reported animated videos (46.6%) and simultaneous drawings (46.5%) as the most effective means of retaining information. Understanding changing learner preferences is important in creating optimal curricula for today's students. Using the LEPO framework, this study identifies critical preferences in successfully teaching medical students, inclusive of commercial and traditional resources. These results can also help guide changes in pedagogy necessary due to the more recent COVID-19 pandemic

Accreditation · Curriculum · Learning styles · Mathematics education · Medical education · Modalities · Pedagogy · Quality (philosophy · Resource (disambiguation · Computer Science · Innovations in Educational Methods · Innovative Teaching Methods · Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences · Medicine · Psychology

  • From MCAT to USMLE

    Open Access•Iren Gharibyan, Emily Ahner et al.•BMC Medical Education•2026

  • Blended learning and augmented employability

    Open Access•Himani Sharma, Varsha Jain et al.•International Journal of…•2024

  • Location Matters

    Open Access•Cynthia A Gallardo•The Urban Review•2026

  • Innovations in Medical Education of the 1950s Contrasted with Those of the 1970s and 1980s

    Patricia L Kendall, George G Reader•Journal of Health and Social…•1988

Unique citing works3
Citations per year1.5
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae