Development of a Digital Lifestyle Modification Intervention for Use after Transient Ischaemic Attack or Minor Stroke
A Person-Based Approach
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15469601 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Neil Heron (0000-0002-4123-9806, Royal Victoria Hospital, corresponding author), Sean O’Connor (0000-0001-5427-243X), Seán R O’Connor (0000-0001-6805-8899, Queen's University Belfast), Frank Kee (0000-0002-0606-8167, Queen's University Belfast), David R Thompson (0000-0001-8518-6307, Queen's University Belfast), Neil Anderson (0000-0001-7192-7717, Queen's University Belfast), David Cutting (0000-0002-1088-4749, Queen's University Belfast), Margaret E Cupples (0000-0002-4248-9700, Queen's University Belfast), Michael Donnelly (0000-0003-3357-8178, Queen's University Belfast) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 9 |
| Pages | 4861-4861 |
| Publication date | 2021-05-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601 |
| Publisher | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3390/ijerph18094861 |
| PMID | 34063298 |
| OpenAlex | W3159960657 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 53 |
This paper describes the development of the 'Brain-Fit' app, a digital secondary prevention intervention designed for use in the early phase after transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke. The aim of the study was to explore perceptions on usability and relevance of the app in order to maximise user engagement and sustainability. Using the theory- and evidence-informed person-based approach, initial planning included a scoping review of qualitative evidence to identify barriers and facilitators to use of digital interventions in people with cardiovascular conditions and two focus groups exploring experiences and support needs of people ( N = 32) with a history of TIA or minor stroke. The scoping review and focus group data were analysed thematically and findings were used to produce guiding principles, a behavioural analysis and explanatory logic model for the intervention. Optimisation included an additional focus group ( N = 12) and individual think-aloud interviews ( N = 8) to explore perspectives on content and usability of a prototype app. Overall, thematic analysis highlighted uncertainty about increasing physical activity and concerns that fatigue might limit participation. Realistic goals and progressive increases in activity were seen as important to improving self-confidence and personal control. The app was seen as a useful and flexible resource. Participant feedback from the optimisation phase was used to make modifications to the app to maximise engagement, including simplification of the goal setting and daily data entry sections. Further studies are required to examine efficacy and cost-effectiveness of this novel digital intervention
Art · Cardiology · Humanities · Intervention (counseling · Ischaemic stroke · Ischemia · Minor (academic · Minor stroke · Physical medicine and rehabilitation · Physical therapy · Psychiatry · Stroke (engine · Transient (computer programming · Cardiac Health and Mental Health · Computer Science · Engineering · Medicine · Physical Activity and Health · Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Qualitative Data Analysis Strategies
Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990–2016
Understanding and Promoting Effective Engagement With Digital Behavior Change Interventions
Guidance on how to develop complex interventions to improve health and healthcare
A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews
The behaviour change wheel
Developing and evaluating complex interventions
Usability and Acceptability of a Novel Secondary Prevention Initiative Targeting Physical Activity for Individuals after a Transient Ischaemic Attack or “Minor” Stroke
The compendium of self-enactable techniques to change and self-manage motivation and behaviour v.1.0
How Many Focus Groups Are Enough? Building an Evidence Base for Nonprobability Sample Sizes
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,2 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2021 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |