Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Nutritional Composition of Gluten-Free Labelled Foods in the Slovenian Food Supply

Bibliographic Data

ID15485376
AuthorsŽiva Lavriša (0000-0002-0384-8846, Inštitut za Nutricionistiko, corresponding author), Maša Hribar (0000-0002-1756-4828, Inštitut za Nutricionistiko), Anita Kušar (0000-0001-9168-9728, Inštitut za Nutricionistiko), Katja Žmitek (0000-0002-0032-318X, University of Ljubljana), Igor Pravst (0000-0001-8634-1778, University of Ljubljana)
Year2020
Volume17
Issue21
Pages8239-8239
Publication date2020-11-07
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph17218239
PMID33171869
OpenAlexW3094913065
LanguageEN
References cited36

The market of gluten-free (GF) foods has been expanding in recent years. GF foods are consumed not only by those with medical predispositions for avoiding gluten, but also by a specific segment of consumers, searching for "healthier" food choices. For these, such practices can present a serious limitation in the variability of food choices. Considering that GF foods are commonly perceived as healthier alternatives, there is a lack of knowledge on the nutritional profile and content of specific nutrients of GF-labelled foods compared to general food supply. A comparison of nutritional composition of GF/non-GF packed foods in the Slovenian food supply was conducted. The nutrient profiling scoring criterion (NPSC) and content of specific nutrients/energy was compared between GF-labelled and regular foods. The highest proportion of GF-labelled products were found in food categories, which typically do not contain gluten (Cheese imitates, Milk imitates, Yoghurt imitates, Canned fish and seafood and Processed meat). Significant differences in the nutrient profile between GF-labelled and regular products were found in Cakes, muffins and pastry, Crisps and snacks, Desserts and Milk imitates. GF-labelled foods often had lower protein and sugar content. Energy value was comparable in most categories and no significant differences in salt content were found, compared to non-GF products. In conclusion, GF-labelled foods will unlikely bring health benefits to those who are not medically required to follow GF diet. Public health initiatives should aim towards promotion of consuming non-processed foods and provision of reliable information about who is required to consume GF foods

Composition (language · Food composition data · Food products · Gluten · Gluten free · Nutrient · Nutrient density · Pastry · Sugar · Wine · Celiac Disease Research and Management · Chemistry · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease · Food Science

  • Can “Low-Fat” Nutrition Labels Lead to Obesity?

    Open Access•Brian Wansink, Pierre Chandon•Journal of Marketing Research•2006

  • The Effect of Packaging Color and Health Claims on Product Attitude and Buying Intention

    Open Access•Alexandra Theben, Melissa Gerards et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • Gluten contamination in gluten-free bakery products

    Open Access•Priscila Farage, Yanna Karla de Medeiros Nóbrega et al.•Public Health Nutrition•2017

Highly citedNo
Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae