Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Self-Assessed Threshold Temperature for Cold among Poultry Industry Workers in Thailand

Bibliographic Data

ID15510575
AuthorsWisanti Laohaudomchok (0000-0003-3790-2801, Mahidol University), Wantanee Phanprasit (0000-0002-3928-3111, Mahidol University), Pajaree Konthonbut (0000-0002-2616-747X, Mahidol University), Chaiyanun Tangtong (0000-0002-5070-0801, Mahidol University), Penpatra Sripaiboonkij (0000-0001-5297-5465, University College Dublin), Tiina M Ikäheimo (0000-0002-2763-6004, UiT The Arctic University of Norway), Jouni J K Jaakkola (0000-0003-4168-4683, University of Oulu), Simo Näyhä (0000-0002-2063-3118, Mahidol University, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume20
Issue3
Pages2067-2067
Publication date2023-01-23
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph20032067
PMID36767437
OpenAlexW4317738109
LanguageEN
References cited46

The self-assessed threshold temperature for cold in the workplace is not well known. We asked 392 chicken industry workers in Thailand what they regard as the cold threshold (CT) and compared subgroups of workers using linear and quantile regressions by CT sextiles (percentiles P 17 , P 33 , P 50 , P 67 , and P 83 , from warmest to coldest). The variables of interest were sex, office work, and sedentary work, with age, clothing thermal insulation, and alcohol consumption as adjustment factors. The mean CT was 14.6 °C. Office workers had a 6.8 °C higher mean CT than other workers, but the difference ranged from 3.8 °C to 10.0 °C from P 17 to P 83 . Sedentary workers had a 2.0 °C higher mean CT than others, but the difference increased from 0.5 °C to 3.0 °C through P 17 -P 83 . The mean CT did not differ between sexes, but men had a 1.6-5.0 °C higher CT at P 17 -P 50 (>20 °C) and a 5.0 °C lower CT at P 83 ( 0.35 m/s) worksites. We conclude that office, sedentary, and female workers and those working at warm, dry, and draughty sites are sensitive to the coldest temperatures, whereas male workers are sensitive even to moderate temperatures

Air temperature · Alcohol · Alcohol consumption · Animal science · Biology · Geography · Meteorology · Percentile · Relative humidity · Significant difference · Skin temperature · Statistics · Building Energy and Comfort Optimization · Chemistry · Climate Change and Health Impacts · Demography · Mathematics · Medicine · Thermoregulation and physiological responses · Internal Medicine

  • Predictive Margins with Survey Data

    Open Access•Barry I Graubard, Edward L Korn•Biometrics•1999

  • International study of temperature, heat and urban mortality

    Anthony J Mcmichael, Paul Wilkinson et al.•International Journal of…•2008

  • Somatic symptom reporting in women and men

    Arthur J Barsky, Heli M Peekna et al.•Journal of General Internal…•2001

  • Outdoor human thermal perception in various climates

    Open Access•Oded Potchter, Pninit Cohen et al.•The Science of The Total…•2018

  • Estimating Model-Adjusted Risks, Risk Differences, and Risk Ratios From Complex Survey Data

    G S Bieler, Gayle Bieler et al.•American Journal of Epidemiology•2010

  • Projections of temperature-related excess mortality under climate change scenarios

    Open Access•Antonio Gasparrini, Yuming Guo et al.•The Lancet Planetary Health•2017

  • Workplace Cold and Perceived Work Ability

    Open Access•Wantanee Phanprasit, Pajaree Konthonbut et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2021

  • Cold-related symptoms and performance degradation among Thai poultry industry workers with reference to vulnerable groups

    Open Access•Nipaporn Auttanate, Chotirot Chotiphan et al.•BMC Public Health•2020

  • Physiological and Subjective Responses to Low Relative Humidity

    Open Access•Yujin Sunwoo, Chinmei Chou et al.•Journal of PHYSIOLOGICAL…•2006

  • Quantile Regression

    Open Access•Roger Koenker, Kevin F Hallock•The Journal of Economic…•2001

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae