Accessibility Analysis of Worldwide Covid-19-Related Information Portals
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15513771 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Patricia Acosta-Vargas (0000-0003-4210-0117, Universidad de Las Américas, corresponding author), Sylvia Novillo-Villegas (0000-0002-7659-6846, Universidad de Las Américas), Belén Salvador-Acosta (0000-0002-3535-3469, Universidad de Las Américas), Manuel Calvopiña (0000-0002-0286-0747, Universidad de Las Américas), Nikolaos C Kyriakidis (0000-0003-1382-5661, Universidad de Las Américas), Esteban Ortiz-Prado (0000-0002-1895-7498, Universidad de Las Américas), Luis Salvador-Ullauri (0000-0001-6348-7870, University of Alicante) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 19 |
| Pages | 12102-12102 |
| Publication date | 2022-09-24 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601 |
| Publisher | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3390/ijerph191912102 |
| PMID | 36231402 |
| OpenAlex | W4297235676 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 10 |
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, communication technology has demonstrated its usefulness in sharing and receiving health data and communicating with the public. This study evaluated the accessibility of 199 websites containing official COVID-19 information related to medical schools, governments, ministries, and medical associations, obtained from the Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research website. We used the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1 to evaluate web accessibility, using a six-phase process with an automatic review tool. The study results reveal that the highest number of barriers encountered are concentrated in the perceivable principle with 6388 errors (77.8%), followed by operability with 1457 (17.7%), then robustness with 291 (3.5%), and finally understandability with 78 errors (0.9%). This study concludes that most COVID-19-related websites that provide information on the context of the pandemic do not have an adequate level of accessibility. This study can contribute as a guide for designing inclusive websites; web accessibility should be reviewed periodically due to technological advances and the need to adapt to these changes
Context (archaeology · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Geography · Internet privacy · Operability · Pandemic · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Digital Accessibility for Disabilities · E-Learning and Knowledge Management · Medicine · Public Health and Environmental Issues
A large‐scale meta‐analytic atlas of mental health problems prevalence during the Covid‐19 early pandemic
Accessibility Analysis of Worldwide Covid-19-Related Information Portals
Exploring WHO Communication during the Covid 19 Pandemic through the WHO Website Based on W3C Guidelines
A review of the accessibility of ACT Covid-19 information portals
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2024 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |