Relationship Health and Intimate Partner Violence in Integrated Primary Care
Individual Characteristics and Preferences for Relationship Support across Risk Levels
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15513882 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dev Crasta (0000-0001-6304-8544, University of Rochester Medicine, corresponding author), Cory A Crane (0000-0003-4562-2949, Rochester Institute of Technology), Nicole Trabold (0000-0001-8480-9592, Rochester Institute of Technology), Robyn L Shepardson (0000-0001-6954-5920, SUNY Upstate Medical University), Kyle Possemato (0000-0003-3456-9580, SUNY Upstate Medical University), Jennifer S Funderburk (0000-0002-9003-2326, SUNY Upstate Medical University) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 21 |
| Pages | 13984-13984 |
| Publication date | 2022-10-27 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601 |
| Publisher | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3390/ijerph192113984 |
| PMID | 36360867 |
| OpenAlex | W4307634723 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 48 |
This study explores differences in characteristics and relationship treatment preferences across different levels of intimate partner violence (IPV) among Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care patients. In Fall 2019, we sent a mail-in survey assessing relationship healthcare needs to N = 299 Veterans randomly sampled from 20 northeastern VA primary care clinics (oversampling female and younger Veterans). We compared those reporting past year use or experience of physical/sexual aggression, threats/coercion, or injury (Severe IPV; 21%), to those only reporting yelling and screaming (Verbal Conflict; 51%), and denying any IPV (No IPV; 28%). Participants across groups desired 2-6 sessions of face-to-face support for couples' health and communication. No IPV participants were older and had preferred treatment in primary care. The Verbal Conflict and Severe IPV groups were both flagged by IPV screens and had similar interest in couple treatment and relationship evaluation. The Severe IPV group had higher rates of harms (e.g., depression, alcohol use disorder, relationship dissatisfaction, fear of partner) and higher interest in addressing safety outside of VA. Exploratory analyses suggested differences based on use vs. experience of Severe IPV. Findings highlight ways integrated primary care teams can differentiate services to address dissatisfaction and conflict while facilitating referrals for Severe IPV
Aggression · Domestic violence · Injury prevention · Medical emergency · Occupational safety and health · Poison control · Psychiatry · Suicide prevention · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics · Clinical Psychology · Human Factors and Ergonomics · Intimate Partner and Family Violence · Medicine · Psychology · Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Mental and Physical Health and Intimate Partner Violence against Women
Meta-analysis and systematic review for the treatment of perpetrators of intimate partner violence
Social Support and Patient Adherence to Medical Treatment
A Short Form of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, and Typologies for Severity and Mutuality
Does marriage and relationship education work? A meta-analytic study.
Testing the ruler with item response theory
The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM‐5 (PCL‐5)
The PHQ-9
A Systematic Review of Intimate Partner Violence Interventions
Brief Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration Screening Tools
Accuracy and Acceptability of a Screening Tool for Identifying Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration among Women Veterans
Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (Audit)
Marriage and health
The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2)
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2024 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |