Evaluation of the association between air pollution and academic performance in school-aged children in Australia

Bibliographic Data

ID15545924
AuthorsRichard J Martino (0000-0003-0121-8864, University of Tasmania, corresponding author), H Dyke (University of Tasmania), Hayley J C Dyke, Caroline X Gao (0000-0002-0987-2759, Monash University), Luke D Knibbs (0000-0002-0399-2370, The University of Sydney), Fay H Johnston (0000-0002-5150-8678, University of Tasmania)
Year2025
Volume20
Issue8
Pages084009-084009
Publication date2025-06-24
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
PublisherIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/ade7a2
OpenAlexW4411593801
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited46

There is increasing international evidence that exposure to air pollutants such as particulate matter less than 2.5 μ ms in diameter (PM 2.5 ) and nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) may be associated with poorer performance in language and numeracy testing in children. This time-series ecological study evaluated the association between annual ambient PM 2.5 and NO 2 exposure and school-level National Assessment Program—Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) scores between 2008 and 2018 in Australia. Annual concentrations of PM 2.5 and NO 2 were estimated with satellite-based land use regression models. Weighted multipollutant mixed effects models, adjusted for available confounders, were used to evaluate the association between air pollutants and school-level NAPLAN scores. A total of 9268 schools were included in the study. We found that increasing exposure to PM 2.5 within a 10 km radius around the school was associated with poorer school-level scores in Reading, Numeracy, Spelling, and Grammar and Punctuation NAPLAN domains for certain grades. Unexpectedly, we found that increasing exposure to NO 2 was associated with higher school-level scores in all domains. Our findings for PM 2.5 are consistent with previous literature and suggest that associations between PM 2.5 and adverse educational outcomes could occur in lower pollution settings. Our findings for NO 2 were in the opposite direction to what was expected from prior studies. We posit that these findings may be driven by uncontrolled confounders, such as individual socio-economic factors or exposure misclassification for NO 2 which has high spatial variability not captured by our models given NO 2 concentrations rapidly decrease away from major high traffic roads. Further exploration of these results is required to understand the association between air pollution and academic performance in this context

Air pollution · Association (psychology · Biology · Environmental health · Geography · Air Quality and Health Impacts · Environmental Science · Medicine · Noise Effects and Management · Psychology · Urban Transport and Accessibility · Ecology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access