Rights-Based Priorities for Children with Send in the Post-Covid-19 Era
A Multi-Method, Multi-Phased, Multi-Stakeholder Consensus Approach
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15717868 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Emma Ashworth (0000-0002-5279-4514, Liverpool John Moores University, corresponding author), Lucy Bray (0000-0001-8414-3233, Edge Hill University), AMEL ALGHRANI (0000-0003-0413-5263, University of Liverpool), Seamus Byrne (0000-0002-8317-3761, Manchester Metropolitan University), Joanna Kirkby (Liverpool John Moores University) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 827-827 |
| Publication date | 2025-06-23 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Children (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2227-9067 • E-ISSN: 2227-9067 |
| Publisher | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3390/children12070827 |
| PMID | 40723020 |
| OpenAlex | W4411583111 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 25 |
Background: The provision of education, health, and social care for children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) in England has long been criticised for its inequities and chronic underfunding. These systemic issues were further exacerbated by the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and the accompanying restrictions, which disrupted essential services and resulted in widespread unmet needs and infringements on the rights of many children with SEND. This study aimed to use a three-phase consensus-building approach with 1353 participants across five stakeholder groups to collaboratively develop evidence-informed priorities for policy and practice. The priorities sought to help address the longstanding disparities and respond to the intensified challenges brought about by the pandemic. Methods: A total of 55 children with SEND (aged 5-16), 893 parents/carers, and 307 professionals working in SEND-related services participated in the first phase through online surveys. This was followed by semi-structured interviews with four children and young people, ten parents/carers, and 15 professionals, allowing for deeper exploration of lived experiences and priorities. The data were analysed, synthesised, and structured into five overarching areas of priority. These were subsequently discussed and refined in a series of activity-based group workshops involving 20 children with SEND, 11 parents/carers, and 38 professionals. Results and Conclusions: The consensus-building process led to the identification of key priorities for both pandemic response and longer-term recovery, highlighting the responsibilities of central Government and statutory services to consider and meet the needs of children with SEND. These priorities are framed within a children's rights context and considered against the rights and duties set out in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989). Priorities include protecting and promoting children with SEND's rights to (1) play, socialise, and be part of a community, (2) receive support for their social and emotional wellbeing and mental health, (3) feel safe, belong, and learn in school, (4) "access health and social care services and therapies", and (5) receive support for their parents/carers and families. Together, they highlight the urgent need for structural reform to ensure that children with SEND receive the support they are entitled to-not only in times of crisis but as a matter of routine practice and policy
2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Business · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Political science · Public relations · Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 · Stakeholder · Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare · Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Medicine · Virology
GRIPP2 reporting checklists
Vulnerable and Forgotten
A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis
Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis
The impact of the Covid‐19 pandemic on the mental health and well‐being of children and young people
Vulnerable and abandoned’—The impact of the Covid ‐19 pandemic on education, health and social care provision for children with Send
Reconciling Children's Policy and Children's Rights
Children as Experts in Their Own Lives
Covid-19 and the Crisis in Social Care
Children’s rights-based childhood policy
Life Under Coronavirus
I'm ready for a new chapter’
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |