Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Month‐olds anticipate others’ actions based on their belief about an object's identity

Bibliographic Data

ID16783248
AuthorsFrances Buttelmann (0000-0003-3476-7659, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, corresponding author), Ágnes Melinda Kovács (0000-0003-3452-7727)
Year2019
Volume24
Issue5
Pages738-751
Publication date2019-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInfancy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1525-0008 • E-ISSN: 1532-7078
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/infa.12303
PMID32677281
OpenAlexW2949508429
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited41

Past research has accumulated evidence regarding infants’ false‐belief understanding, measuring their gaze patterns or active helping behaviors. However, the underlying mechanisms are still debated, specifically, whether young infants can compute that others represent the world under a certain aspect. Such performance requires holding in mind two representations about the same object simultaneously and attributing only one to another person. While 14‐month‐olds can encode an object under different aspects when forming first‐person representations, it is unclear whether infants at this very age could also predict others’ behavior based on their beliefs about an object's identity. Here, we investigate this question in a novel eye‐tracking‐based unexpected‐identity task. We measured 14‐month‐olds’ anticipatory looks combined with their looking time, using a violation‐of‐expectation paradigm. Results show that 14‐month‐olds look longer to an actor's reach that is incongruent with her false belief about the identity of an object compared to a congruent reach. Furthermore, infants correctly anticipated the actor's reach based on her false belief. Thus, as soon as infants represent dual identities they can integrate them in belief attributions and use them for consequent behavioral predictions. Such data provide evidence for the flexibility of false‐belief attributions and support proposals arguing for infants’ rich theory‐of‐mind abilities

Attribution · Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Developmental psychology · False belief · Gaze · Theory of mind · Child and Animal Learning Development · Computer Science · Memory and Neural Mechanisms · Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior · Psychology · Social Psychology · Artificial Intelligence

  • Is there continuity from implicit recognition of intentional action in infants to explicit mindreading in preschoolers? Systematic review of longitudinal evidence and theoretical implications ( ¿Hay continuidad entre el reconocimiento implícito de la acción intencional en bebés y la lectura de mente explícita en preescolares? Revisión sistemática de la evidencia longitudinal e implicaciones teóricas )

    Open Access•Anyerson Stiths Gómez Tabares•Journal for the Study of…•2023

  • Do toddlers reason about other people's experiences of objects? A limit to early mental state reasoning

    Open Access•Brandon Matthew Woo, Gabriel H Chisholm et al.•Cognition•2024

  • Model-free metacognition

    Open Access•Peter Carruthers, David M Williams•Cognition•2022

  • Can infants adopt underspecified contents into attributed beliefs? Representational prerequisites of theory of mind

    Open Access•Ágnes Melinda Kovács, Ernő Téglás et al.•Cognition•2021

  • Empirical assumptions behind the violation of expectation experiments in human and non-human animals

    Open Access•Santiago Ginnobili, Andrea Soledad Olmos•History & Philosophy of the Life…•2021

  • Knowledge first

    Open Access•Francesco Antilici•Synthese•2024

  • False-belief understanding in infants

    Open Access•Renée Baillargeon, Rose M Scott et al.•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2010

  • Pretending and believing

    Open Access•Angela Maria Leslie, Alan M Leslie•Cognition•1994

  • Action Anticipation Through Attribution of False Belief by 2-Year-Olds

    Open Access•Victoria Southgate, Atsushi Senju et al.•Psychological Science•2007

  • Mindreading in Infancy

    Open Access•Peter Carruthers•Mind & Language•2013

  • Do 15-Month-Old Infants Understand False Beliefs?

    Open Access•Kristine H Onishi, Renée Baillargeon•Science•2005

  • Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach

    Open Access•Arthur Woodward•Cognition•1998

  • The Social Sense

    Open Access•Ágnes Melinda Kovács, Ernő Téglás et al.•Science•2010

  • Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states?

    Ian A Apperly, Stephen Butterfill et al.•Psychological Review•2009

  • Children's Understanding of Representational Change and Its Relation to the Understanding of False Belief and the Appearance-Reality Distinction

    Alison Gopnik, Janet Wilde Astington•Child Development•1988

  • Attribution of Beliefs by 13-Month-Old Infants

    Open Access•Luca Surian, Stefania Caldi et al.•Psychological Science•2007

  • Early Theory of Mind Competencies

    Open Access•Birgit Träuble, Vesna Marinović et al.•Infancy•2010

  • Mindreading in adults

    Open Access•Peter Carruthers•Synthese•2017

  • Object names and object functions serve as cues to categories for infants

    Amy E Booth, Sandra Waxman et al.•Developmental Psychology•2002

  • Infants' reasoning about others' false perceptions

    Hyun-Joo Song, Renée Baillargeon•Developmental Psychology•2008

  • Fourteen-month-old infants infer the continuous identity of objects on the basis of nonvisible causal properties

    Trix Cacchione, Simone Schaub et al.•Developmental Psychology•2013

Unique citing works6
Citations per year1,2
Citation span2021 - 2024 (4)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae