Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Using Targeted Feedback to Address Common Student Misconceptions in Introductory Programming

A Data-Driven Approach

Bibliographic Data

ID16913630
AuthorsYizhou Qian (0000-0003-2551-9581, Jiangnan University, corresponding author), James Daniel Lehman (0000-0002-5072-3747, Purdue University West Lafayette)
Year2019
Volume9
Issue4
Publication date2019-10-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSAGE Open (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2158-2440 • E-ISSN: 2158-2440
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/2158244019885136
OpenAlexW2981974458
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited64

With the expansion of computer science (CS) education, CS teachers in K-12 schools should be cognizant of student misconceptions and be prepared to help students establish accurate understanding of computer science and programming. Digital tools, such as automated assessment systems, can be useful and supportive in teaching CS courses. This two-stage design-based research (DBR) study investigated the effects of targeted feedback in an automated assessment system for addressing common misconceptions of high school students in a Java-based introductory programming course. Based on students’ common errors and underlying misconceptions, targeted feedback messages were designed and provided for students. The quantitative analysis found that with targeted feedback students were more likely to correct the errors in their code. The qualitative analysis of students’ solutions revealed that when improving the code, students receiving feedback made fewer intermediate incorrect solutions. In other words, the targeted feedback messages may help to promote conceptual change and facilitate learning. Although the findings of this exploratory study showed evidence of the power of digital tools, more research is needed to make technology benefit more CS teachers

Exploratory research · Java · Mathematics education · Medical education · Programming language · Qualitative property · Computer Science · Educational Games and Gamification · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Medicine · Psychology · Teaching and Learning Programming

  • Exploring the quality and effectiveness of AI-generated feedback in introductory programming

    Open Access•Yizhou Qian, Meishan Liu et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2026

  • The Impact of Narrative Feedback, E-Learning Modules and Realistic Video and the Reduction of Misconception

    Open Access•Abdul Halim, Elmi Mahzum et al.•Education Sciences•2021

  • Dialogue alongside or within lecturing videos for teaching debugging

    Lu Ding, Krista J Stacey et al.•Journal of Research on Technology…•2026

  • A multidimensional comparative analysis of human expert vs. AI-driven feedback approaches on learner-centered and collaborative groups

    Hatice Yıldız Durak, Hatice Yildiz Durak et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2026

  • A review of automated feedback systems for learners

    Open Access•Galina Deeva, Daria Bogdanova et al.•Computers & Education•2021

  • Integrating Computational Thinking Diagnostic Mechanism and Reflective Learning

    Open Access•Ting‐ting Wu, Hsin‐Yu Lee et al.•Journal of Computer Assisted…•2025

  • Toward an Epistemology of Physics

    Andrea A Disessa•Cognition and Instruction•1993

  • Scratch

    Open Access•Mitchel Resnick, John Maloney et al.•Communications of the ACM•2009

  • Misconceptions Reconceived

    John P Smith, John P Smith III et al.•Journal of the Learning Sciences•1994

  • The Instructional Effect of Feedback in Test-Like Events

    Open Access•Robert L Bangert-Drowns, Robert L Bangert‐Drowns et al.•Review of Educational Research•1991

  • Feedback in written instruction

    Open Access•Raymond W Kulhavy, William A Stock•Educational Psychology Review•1989

  • Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change

    Open Access•Stella Vosniadou•Learning and Instruction•1994

  • Accommodation of a scientific conception

    Open Access•George J Posner, Kenneth A Strike et al.•Science Education•1982

  • Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning

    Open Access•Deborah L Butler, Philip H Winne•Review of Educational Research•1995

  • Conceptual change

    Reinders Duit, David F Treagust•International Journal of Science…•2003

  • Focus on Formative Feedback

    Open Access•Valerie J Shute•Review of Educational Research•2008

  • Those Who Understand

    Open Access•Lee S Shulman•Educational Researcher•1986

  • Design-Based Research

    Open Access•Terry Anderson, Julie Shattuck•Educational Researcher•2012

  • The Power of Feedback

    Open Access•John Hattie, Helen Timperley•Review of Educational Research•2007

  • An Overview of Conceptual Change Theories

    Open Access•Gökhan Özdemir, Douglas B Clark•Eurasia Journal of Mathematics…•2007

Citations per year1.2
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae