Do not (Just) Think, But (Also) Feel
Empirical Corroboration of Emotion-Involved Processing Hypothesis on Foreign Language Lexical Retention
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16914637 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yu Kanazawa (0000-0003-1398-5913, Kwansei Gakuin University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Publication date | 2021-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | SAGE Open (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2158-2440 • E-ISSN: 2158-2440 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/21582440211032153 |
| OpenAlex | W3183413065 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 38 |
Emotion plays important roles in learning, memory, and other cognitive processes; it does so not only in the form of macro-level emotion (e.g., salient affective states and self-reportable motivational currents) but also in the form of micro-level emotion (e.g., subtle feelings and linguistic attributes that are usually processed subconsciously without special attention). According to the Emotion-Involved Processing Hypothesis (EIPH), processing that draws attention to emotional aspects (EmInvProc+) is postulated as a deeper version of semantic processing which has cognitive advantage to facilitate linguistic processing and retention more than non-emotional semantic processing (EmInvProc−). This study empirically investigated whether the EIPH can be experimentally corroborated for learners of a distant foreign language (viz., Japanese learners of English). In the experiment, participants processed visually presented English words that were either positively or negatively valenced under different conditions, followed by the test session in which they engaged in memory tests. Two processing modes were compared (EmInvProc+ vs. EmInvProc−). The dependent variables were correct recall frequency, correct recognition frequency, and correct recognition reaction time. It was revealed that EmInvProc+ was more cognitively facilitatory in making stronger foreign language lexical memory traces than EmInvProc− for all the measures employed in the experiment, regarding both accuracy (correct response frequency) and fluency (correct response reaction time). Therefore, it is implied that EmInvProc+ can be regarded as a sui generis deeper level of processing that is qualitatively distinguishable from mere semantic processing, supporting the Emotion-Involved Processing Hypothesis
Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Feeling · Fluency · Levels-of-processing effect · Processing fluency · Recall · Semantic memory · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Psychology · Social Psychology
Teaching and Researching
Pragmatism
Nonwords
Introducing LexTale
Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words
The MRC Psycholinguistic Database
The Neural Representation of Abstract Words
The English Lexicon Project
Receptive and Productive Vocabulary Sizes of L2 Learners
Levels of processing
Emotional Intelligence
Apple Tree Model of Emotion-Involved Processing
Positive psychology
The role of attention and relatedness in emotionally enhanced memory
Effects of Trait Emotional Intelligence and Sociobiographical Variables on Communicative Anxiety and Foreign Language Anxiety Among Adult Multilinguals
The on-line Yes/No test as a placement tool
Processing of emotional words in bilinguals
A short history of SLA
The inseparability of cognition and emotion in second language learning
Emotion Vocabulary in Interlanguage
The rise of affectivism
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2024 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |