Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement Used to Justify School Violence in Sicilian Primary School
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16946320 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Inmaculada Méndez Mateo (0000-0001-8458-5314, Universidad de Murcia), Giuseppa Liccardi (Universidad de Murcia), Cecilia Ruiz Esteban (0000-0002-5836-331X, Universidad de Murcia, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 682-690 |
| Publication date | 2020-06-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2174-8144 • E-ISSN: 2254-9625 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/ejihpe10030050 |
| PMID | 34542504 |
| OpenAlex | W3039603182 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 21 |
This study investigated the mechanisms of moral disengagement most commonly used to justify school violence in Sicilian primary school. The main objective of this study was to analyze the mechanisms of moral disengagement that are set in motion by those involved in situations of school violence (victims, aggressors, and bystanders) in Sicilian primary school. Likewise, the differences by gender and age are investigated. A total of 113 subjects in primary school were recruited (56.6% girls). The ages ranged from 8 to 11 (M = 9.56, SD = 0.99). The first scale used was the Bullying Inventory by Olweus (1993) in the Italian translation by Genta, Menesini, Fonzi, Costabile, and Smith (1996) and the questionnaire on moral disengagement developed by Caprara, Barbaranelli, Vicino, and Bandura (1996) is also used. The regression analysis showed that the sociodemographic variables and the mechanisms of moral disengagement are different depending on a person’s role (aggressor, victim, or bystander). Moral justification predicted the role of victim in school violence, dehumanization predicted the role of the aggressor (and gender), and the disclosure of responsibility (and dehumanization) predicted the role of the bystander in school violence. The conclusions of this study will facilitate the prevention of school violence, for example, by promoting social integration and minimizing situations of school violence (emphasizing morality, ethics, etc.), thereby establishing balanced and satisfactory interpersonal relationships
Dehumanization · Developmental psychology · Disengagement theory · Interpersonal communication · Moral disengagement · Morality · Political science · Sicilian · Sociology · Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression · Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development · Medicine · Orthoptera Research and Taxonomy · Psychology · Social Psychology
Moral Disengagement in Adolescent Offenders
Restorative Justice Education from Intrajudicial Criminal Mediation Associated Factors
Minimizing responsibility in the aggressive dynamics of bullying and its impact on other strategies of moral disengagement
Testing the reciprocal longitudinal association between pro-aggressive bystander behavior and diffusion of responsibility in Swedish upper elementary school students
Profiles of bullying, cyberbullying, and disinterest in reading among primary school learners in Spain
Witnessing Cyberbullying and Internalizing Symptoms among Middle School Students
Empathy and Moral Development
School Bullying
Some problems with cyberbullying research
Selective Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency
The Efficacy of the Tabby Improved Prevention and Intervention Program in Reducing Cyberbullying and Cybervictimization among Students
For Whom Is Anti-Bullying Intervention Most Effective? The Role of Temperament
Moral disengagement among children and youth
The efficacy of teachers’ responses to incidents of bullying and victimization
Individual and Class Moral Disengagement in Bullying Among Elementary School Children
Moral emotions and bullying
Sociocognitive self-regulatory mechanisms governing transgressive behavior
Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2024 (5) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |