Planning and evaluating climate resilience programs in Southern Africa
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 17554647 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Caitlin Blaser Mapitsa (0000-0002-8189-8451, University of the Witwatersrand, corresponding author), Malebajoa Anicia Maoela (0000-0001-5886-7991, University of South Africa), Sibongiseni Mkhize (0000-0001-6381-662X), Samukelisiwe Mkhize (Wits University Donald Gordon Medical Centre) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 117 |
| Pages | 102782-102782 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Evaluation and Program Planning (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0149-7189 • E-ISSN: 1873-7870 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2026.102782 |
| PMID | 42000601 |
| OpenAlex | W7139996516 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 44 |
Southern Africa faces intensifying climate risks shaped by rising temperatures, prolonged droughts, extreme weather events, and deep structural inequalities. As investment in climate resilience programming grows, so does the need for rigorous, context-sensitive frameworks for planning and evaluating such programmes. Yet current approaches to vulnerability assessment, predominantly built on the IPCC dimensions of exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity, often fail to capture the social, institutional, and relational drivers that shape how communities experience and respond to climate change. This paper employs a qualitative, comparative case study methodology to examine three climate resilience programmes implemented across Southern Africa between 2018 and 2023. Drawing on both primary data, including household surveys, participatory rural appraisals, ethnographic interviews, and micro-narrative studies, and secondary sources, the authors conduct a structured cross-case analysis of how vulnerability was conceptualised, how programme responses were designed, and how outcomes were evaluated. The authors propose an expanded vulnerability framework that builds on the IPCC model by incorporating three additional dimensions: mitigation and preparedness, response capacity, and recovery capacity. These additions are argued to better reflect the social dimensions of vulnerability, particularly in contexts of institutional fragility and structural inequality. Findings demonstrate that vulnerability in Southern Africa is shaped not only by climatic exposure but by governance failures, land tenure insecurity, limitations of social protection, and the marginalisation of indigenous knowledge. Programmes that adopted participatory, iterative approaches were more effective at revealing these intersectional and structural dimensions of vulnerability. The paper argues for a more holistic approach to resilience programming that integrates material, relational, and subjective dimensions of wellbeing, and calls for evaluation frameworks that go beyond economic and agricultural indicators. These findings have practical implications for national and international development agencies involved in climate adaptation programming across the sub-region
Climate change · Climate resilience · Poison control · Psychological resilience · Resilience (materials science) · Vulnerability (computing) · Climate Change and Sustainable Development · Climate change impacts on agriculture · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
The Dynamics of Rural Vulnerability to Global Change
Climate Change Vulnerability Assessments
Sustainable livelihood framework-based indicators for assessing climate change vulnerability and adaptation for Himalayan communities
Climate change-induced livelihood adaptive strategies and perceptions of forest-dependent communities
Land degradation in South Africa
Methods to Make Sense of Resilience
Characterising the nature of household vulnerability to climate variability
Strategies for coping with severe food deficits in rural Africa
On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices
Developing an intersectionally-informed, multi-sited, critical policy ethnography to examine power and procedural justice in multiscalar energy and climate change decisionmaking processes
How do scientific assessments learn
A composite indicator model to assess natural disaster risks in industry on a spatial level
Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity”
Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors
Vulnerability and resilience of remote rural communities to shocks and global changes
Vulnerabilities and Inequalities Experienced by Women in the Climate Change Discourse in South Africa’s Rural Communities
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Climate Change 2022 - Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability
Multidimensional Model for Vulnerability Assessment of Urban Flooding
Vulnerability
Risk analysis and climate change
Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |