“It was a force for good but…”
A mixed-methods evaluation of the implementation of the high in fat, sugar and salt (HFSS) legislation in England
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 17619488 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alice R Kininmonth (0000-0002-1145-525X, University of Leeds, corresponding author), Rebecca Ann Stone (0000-0002-8910-8792, University of Leeds), Victoria Jenneson (0000-0003-2468-8009, University of Leeds), Emily Ennis (0000-0002-4375-8749, University of Leeds), Robyn Naisbitt (University of Leeds), Alexandra M Johnstone (0000-0002-5484-292X, University of Aberdeen), Michelle Morris (0000-0002-9325-619X, University of Leeds), Michelle A Morris, Alison Fildes (0000-0002-5452-2512, University of Leeds) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 139 |
| Pages | 103048-103048 |
| Publication date | 2026-02-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Food Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0306-9192 • E-ISSN: 1873-5657 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.foodpol.2026.103048 |
| OpenAlex | W7128726781 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 42 |
Stakeholders viewed the legislation as a force for good but highlighted challenges in implementation and enforcement. • Stakeholders reported limited government communication, delayed guidance, and access to product nutrition data as key implementation challenges. • Seven policy recommendations were co-developed to support the development and implementation of effective food policy in future. In 2022, legislation in England restricted products high in fat, sugar, or salt (HFSS) in prominent store locations. This study explores retail sector (including enforcement of legislation in retail) responses to the legislation’s implementation. Four major UK retailers – ASDA, Morrisons, Sainsbury’s and Tesco − completed business-level online surveys. Interviews were conducted with representatives from three retailers (n = 13; Asda, Morrisons, Sainsbury’s), the British Retail Consortium (n = 1), and primary authority enforcement (n = 1) (N = 15). Data were collected between July and November 2024. Findings informed co-production workshops (n = 3) to develop policy recommendations. Stakeholders supported legislation aims but voiced concerns about complexities with interpretation and implementation, limited communication with government, access to product nutrition data, and delays to guidance. Retailers utilised various HFSS product promotional strategies while achieving compliance. Retailers reported very limited enforcement. These findings were synthesised and facilitated the development of seven policy recommendations through co-production workshops between academics and the Institute of Grocery distribution. HFSS legislation represents a landmark shift in regulation of the retail food environment, but clearer, timely guidance, data provision, and transparent co-production with actors cognisant of the food sector is needed to ensure legislation can be effectively implemented, enforced and evaluated
Enforcement · Food policy · Government (linguistics) · Legislation · Product (mathematics) · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Obesity and Health Practices
Co-creation, co-design, co-production for public health – a perspective on definitions and distinctions
Semistructured interviewing in primary care research
Creating Healthy Food and Eating Environments
Can rapid approaches to qualitative analysis deliver timely, valid findings to clinical leaders? A mixed methods study comparing rapid and thematic analysis
Whole systems approaches to obesity and other complex public health challenges
The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health
Retail Grocery Store Marketing Strategies and Obesity
Obesity in children and young people
Systems science and systems thinking for public health
Food Swamps Predict Obesity Rates Better Than Food Deserts in the United States
Co-creation of health-enabling initiatives in food retail
The challenges of interventions to promote healthier food in independent takeaways in England
How food companies influence evidence and opinion – straight from the horse’s mouth
Playing the policy game
Six modes of co-production for sustainability
Industry responses to the UK government’s public consultation on the proposed soft drinks industry levy
Whose rights deserve protection? Framing analysis of responses to the 2016 Committee of Advertising Practice consultation on the non-broadcast advertising of foods and soft drinks to children
Front-of-pack nutrition labels. Their effect on attention and choices when consumers have varying goals and time constraints
Nothing can be done until everything is done’
A Healthy Retail Intervention in Native American Convenience Stores
Customer awareness and perceptions of the high in fat, sugar, and salt (HFSS) placement legislation and impacts on self-reported food purchasing
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |