Politicizing Mobility in the Covid-19 Pandemic

International Student Mobility in Israel, China, and the United Arab Emirates

Bibliographic Data

ID18926973
AuthorsAnnette Bamberger (0000-0001-8006-5557, Bar-Ilan University, corresponding author), Min Ji Kim (0000-0002-6027-7031, University College London), Seung-Ah Lee (0000-0003-4391-7049, HEC Paris in Qatar), Fei Yan (0000-0001-7477-5990)
Year2025
Volume38
Issue3
Pages290-311
Publication date2025-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Justice Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0885-7466 • E-ISSN: 1573-6725
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11211-025-00455-3
OpenAlexW4410552396
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited54

We critically examine the politicization of international student mobility (ISM) during the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on Israel, China, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Applying Vicki Squire’s framework of the politics of control and migration, we reveal how the pandemic intensified existing political tensions and inequalities, challenging depoliticized narratives of ISM. The study demonstrates how crises magnify societal organizing principles and embed mobility policies within broader struggles over national identity, economic priorities, and geopolitical strategies. In Israel, selective border reopening exposed tensions between religious and secular interests, with lobbying efforts shaping mobility outcomes. China’s intensified regulation of ISM highlighted the state’s efforts to leverage mobility as a tool for soft power, narrative control, and geopolitical positioning. In the UAE, private universities adapted by targeting ‘permanently temporary’ expatriates with tuition incentives, revealing systemic inequities within its dual-track higher education system. Our analysis underscores ISM as a dynamic and contested field shaped by the interplay of state power, institutional strategies, and individual agency. We highlight the co-constitutive relationship between control and migration politics, demonstrating how mobility evolves across governance systems and through negotiation and resistance. These findings offer critical insights into ISM’s role as a site of political contestation and its implications for equity, access, and social justice

2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · China · Development economics · Economic growth · Economics · Outbreak · Pandemic · Political science · Social policy · Education and experiences of immigrants and refugees · Law · Medicine · Migration, Health and Trauma · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Virology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access