How Does Leader Self‐Sacrifice Lead to Subordinate Self‐Sacrifice? A Conformity Perspective
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19234331 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Feifan Yang (0000-0002-6599-2149, Business School Soochow University Suzhou China), Mengxi Yang (0000-0001-7082-2956, School of Economics and Management University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China, corresponding author), Yufei Liu (0000-0003-1423-6228, School of Business Administration Dongbei University of Finance and Economics Dalian China, corresponding author), Alexander Newman (0000-0003-1170-8947, Melbourne Business School The University of Melbourne Melbourne Australia), B Wang (0000-0002-7170-0835, Monash University), Bin Wang (0000-0002-8591-8528, Department of Management Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Organizational Behavior (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0894-3796 • E-ISSN: 1099-1379 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/job.70102 |
| OpenAlex | W7164308421 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 74 |
Prior studies have typically viewed self‐sacrificing managers as “good leaders” who inspire their employees through such positive mechanisms as fostering identification with the leader and cultivating high‐quality leader–follower relationships that benefit both parties. Based on theories of conformity, we challenge the prevailing supportive view by arguing that leader self‐sacrifice (LSS) can increase subordinate self‐sacrifice through a pressure‐based mechanism. Specifically, using data from one experiment and two 3‐wave field studies, we found that LSS was positively related to subordinate self‐sacrificial pressure, which in turn prompted subordinate self‐sacrifice. Furthermore, we established that leader autonomy support mitigated these effects: When leaders provided greater autonomy support, their employees experienced lower levels of self‐sacrificial pressure induced by LSS. These findings reveal a previously overlooked, pressure‐driven mechanism through which LSS influences followers, and thus, even well‐intentioned leader behaviors can impose hidden psychological demands on subordinates
Autonomy · Conformity · Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior · Personality Traits and Psychology · Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
A Review of Self-Determination Theory’s Basic Psychological Needs at Work
Leadership in applied psychology
The Role of Followers in the Charismatic Leadership Process
Experience Sampling Methods
Centering Decisions in Hierarchical Linear Models
The Motivational Effects of Charismatic Leadership
Back-translation practices in organizational research
A Critical Review and Best‐Practice Recommendations for Control Variable Usage
Jeer Pressure
Social Influence
Leader self‐sacrifice
Hair Matters
Group Size and Conformity
Statistical control in correlational studies
Citizenship under pressure
Can self‐sacrificial leadership promote subordinate taking charge? The mediating role of organizational identification and the moderating role of risk aversion
Exploring the dark side of organizational citizenship behavior
A Theory of Conformity
Sensitivity to the evaluation of others emerges by 24 months
Conformity decreases throughout middle childhood among ni-Vanuatu children
Just Going Along
The measurement of experienced burnout
The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits
Perceived algorithmic evaluation and app‐workers' service performance
On the social influence of emotions in groups
A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |