Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Discrepant performance on multiple‐choice and short answer assessments and the relation of performance to general scholastic aptitude

Bibliographic Data

ID19378638
AuthorsApril Bleske‐rechek (0000-0003-3578-2105, University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire, corresponding author), Nicole Zeug (University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire), Nicole M Zeug (University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire), Rose Mary Webb (0000-0003-0669-2813, Appalachian State University)
Year2007
Volume32
Issue2
Pages89-105
Publication date2007-04-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0260-2938 • E-ISSN: 1469-297X
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/02602930600800763
OpenAlexW2100214123
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited9

We conducted correlational and performance discrepancy analyses on exam and achievement data taken from students in three psychology courses. Across courses, the same findings emerged. First, only a small fraction of students consistently performed more strongly on one type of assessment (e.g., multiple‐choice) than on another (e.g., short answer). Second, students’ multiple‐choice performance, above and beyond their short answer performance, accounted for variation in students’ standing on achievement measures unrelated to psychology (including high school class standing, American College Test score, and college grade point average). In contrast, students’ short answer performance, above and beyond their multiple‐choice performance, did not account for variation in students’ standing on those achievement measures. Our findings support the continued use of multiple‐choice items to assess student learning

Academic achievement · Achievement test · Aptitude · Developmental psychology · Mathematics education · Multiple choice · Significant difference · Standardized test · Statistics · Cognitive Abilities and Testing · Education, Achievement, and Giftedness · Mathematics · Psychology · Psychometric Methodologies and Testing · Social Psychology

  • Application of the Overclaiming Technique to Scholastic Assessment

    Open Access•Delroy L Paulhus, Patrick J Dubois•Educational and Psychological…•2014

  • Math anxiety and perfectionistic concerns in multiple-choice assessment

    María Isabel Núñez‐Peña, María Isabel Núñez-Peña et al.•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2021

  • Quantifying the Effects of Chance in Multiple Choice and True/False Tests

    Richard F Burton•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2001

  • Statistical Modelling of Multiple‐choice and True/False Tests

    Richard F Burton, David Miller et al.•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•1999

  • Educational uses of tests with disadvantaged students

    T Anne Cleary, Lloyd G Humphreys et al.•American Psychologist•1975

  • Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests

    Open Access•Lee J Cronbach•Psychometrika•1951

Citations per year0.17
Citation span2014 - 2021 (8)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae