Reflecting on Teaching
The benefits of self‐evaluation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19378670 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lyndal Taylor (Queensland University of Technology, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1994 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 109-122 |
| Publication date | 1994-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0260-2938 • E-ISSN: 1469-297X |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/0260293940190204 |
| OpenAlex | W1974660322 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 17 |
Essential to the improvement of teaching effectiveness is evaluation. Evaluation can take many forms, but any process directly involves the teacher. Self‐evaluation is a process whereby teachers collect the data on their own teaching effectiveness and analyse the information to consider improvement to that teaching. This process can be undertaken in a number of ways. However, the unique benefit of self‐evaluation is the close involvement of teachers in the consideration of the effectiveness of their own teaching. This article considers different methods of self‐evaluation and suggests a technique that has been found to be successful
Evaluation methods · Mathematics education · Medical education · Self evaluation · Teaching method · Applied Psychology · Computer Science · Engineering · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Evaluation of Teaching Practices · Medicine · Psychology · Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
What Counts as Teaching
Law Students' Attitudes Towards Assessment
Topic Evaluation
Staff and Peer Assessment ‐ Measuring an Individual's Contribution to Group Performance
Self and Student Evaluation of Academic Staff
Evaluating Teaching and Assessing Teachers in Universities
Self‐confrontation Through Video‐playback
The Impact of Formative and Summative Evaluation of Teaching in North American Universities
Journal of higher education
Making Teacher Evaluation Work
An Assessment of Faculty Performance
| Citations per year | 0.21 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2002 - 2014 (13) |
| Highly cited | No |