Student Performance Under Different Assessment Situations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19379226 |
|---|---|
| Authors | B A Chansarkar (Middlesex University), U Raut‐Roy (Middlesex University) |
| Year | 1987 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 115-122 |
| Publication date | 1987-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0260-2938 • E-ISSN: 1469-297X |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/0260293870120204 |
| OpenAlex | W2064236351 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 7 |
This paper examines the student performance on an undergraduate honours degree at Middlesex Polytechnic, under four different methods of assessment, where traditional examination is combined with 'seen' question, case studies (seen and unseen) and projects. The analysis shows that the traditional examination should be combined with other methods of assessment as the student performance is worst under examination and the performance improves when combined with other methods. Further, the analysis shows that the weaker students benefit by achieving significantly higher marks in the non‐examination component rather than the examination
Mathematics education · Computer Science · Online and Blended Learning · Psychology
Class size, coursework assessment and student performance in geography
Coursework versus examinations in end-of-module assessment
The ‘Power Test’
To see or not to see? Comparing the effectiveness of examinations and end of module assessments in online distance learning
Are UK degree standards going up, down or sideways
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.17 |
| Citation span | 1996 - 2018 (23) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |