Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Professional respect for female and male leaders

Influential gender‐relevant factors

Bibliographic Data

ID19448246
AuthorsHans‐Joachim Wolfram (0000-0003-3696-6432, Leipzig University), Gisela Mohr (Leipzig University), Birgit Schyns (0000-0001-8604-1994, University of Portsmouth)
Year2007
Volume22
Issue1
Pages19-32
Publication date2007-02-06
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueWomen in Management Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0964-9425 • E-ISSN: 1758-7182
PublisherEmerald (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1108/09649420710726201
OpenAlexW2080432039
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited25

Purpose The paper aims to test the impact of gender‐relevant factors on professional respect for leaders. Design/methodology/approach Three determinants were analysed: gender constellation (gender match) between leaders and followers, gender‐stereotypic leadership behaviour, and followers' gender role attitudes. A field study with N 1 =121 followers and their N 2 =81 direct leaders from 34 German organisations was conducted. Leaders were on the lowest level of hierarchy. Findings The data showed that female leaders are at risk of receiving less professional respect from their followers than male leaders: male followers of female leaders had less professional respect than female followers of male leaders. Moreover, gender role discrepant female leaders (i.e. autocratic) got less respect than gender role discrepant male leaders (i.e. democratic). But no difference was found with regard to gender role congruent female (i.e. democratic) and male (i.e. autocratic) leaders. Finally, followers with traditional gender role attitudes were prone to have comparatively little professional respect for female leaders. Research limitations/implications Future research should analyse gender‐relevant factors that influence the granting of professional respect and systematically compare these effects across branches. Furthermore, it would be interesting to see whether followers evaluate leaders from higher levels of hierarchy in the same way as our respondents did. Practical implications In order to promote women in leadership positions, followers' prejudices against female leaders should be reduced. Originality/value Field studies about the evaluation of female and male leaders explicitly considering their followers' gender role attitudes are rare. The results reflect that sexism is well and alive

Autocracy · Democracy · Gender role · Hierarchy · Originality · Political science · Politics · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Gender Roles and Identity Studies · Psychology · Social Psychology · Sports, Gender, and Society

  • Exploring College Students’ Attitudes towards Female Lecturers’ Competence in Teacher Education Colleges in Masvingo Province, Zimbabwe

    Open Access•Zikhali Joyce, Joyce Zikhali et al.•The Anthropologist•2012

  • An exploration of unspoken bias

    Open Access•Renee L Warning, F Robert Buchanan•Gender in Management An…•2009

  • Exploring female managers’ perceptions of the behavioral effectiveness of male managers

    Open Access•Hussain Alhejji, Robert G Hamlin et al.•Gender in Management An…•2025

  • Where’s the beef

    Katie Olsen•Feminist Media Studies•2021

  • Respect in principal–teacher relations at primary schools in Turkey

    Sabri Güngör, İnayet Aydın et al.•International Journal of…•2012

  • Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange

    Robert C Liden, R Liden•Journal of Management•1998

  • Gpower

    Open Access•Edgar Erdfelder, Franz Faul et al.•Behavior Research Methods,…•1996

  • Meta-Analytic review of leader–member exchange theory

    Charlotte R Gerstner, David V Day•Journal of Applied Psychology•1997

  • Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.

    Alice H Eagly, Steven J Karau•Psychological Review•2002

  • Gender-Stereotypic Images of Occupations Correspond to the Sex Segregation of Employment

    Open Access•Mary Ann Cejka, Alice H Eagly•Personality and Social Psychology…•1999

  • Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Toward Female Authority

    Open Access•Laurie A Rudman, Stephen E Kilianski•Personality and Social Psychology…•2000

  • The female leadership advantage

    Open Access•Alice H Eagly, Linda L Carli•The Leadership Quarterly•2003

  • Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory. I. A personality description approach to the assessment of sex stereotypes

    Open Access•Richard D Ashmore, Mary Lou Tumia•Sex Roles•1980

  • A Closer Look Beneath the Surface

    Open Access•Sabine Sczesny•Sex Roles•2003

  • A Global Look at Psychological Barriers to Women's Progress in Management

    Open Access•Virginia E Schein•Journal of Social Issues•2001

  • When stereotypes hurt

    Open Access•Norma Costrich, Joan Feinstein et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•1975

  • Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles

    Alice H Eagly, Valerie J Steffen•Journal of Personality and Social…•1984

  • Gender and leadership style

    Alice H Eagly, Blair T Johnson•Psychological Bulletin•1990

  • Gender and the evaluation of leaders

    Alice H Eagly, Mona G Makhijani et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1992

  • Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles

    Alice H Eagly, Mary C Johannesen-Schmidt et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2003

  • Gender and the effectiveness of leaders

    Alice H Eagly, Steven J Karau et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1995

Unique citing works5
Citations per year0,29
Citation span2009 - 2025 (17)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae