Co‐Authoring and Reporting on Lived Experience Engagement in Mental Health and/or Substance Research
A Qualitative Study and Guidance Document
Datos Bibliográficos
INTRODUCTION: There is a move towards engaging people with lived experience and families (PWLE/F)-also referred to as PWLE/F engagement-in mental health and/or substance use research. However, PWLE/F engagement is inadequately reported on in mental health and/or substance use research papers. OBJECTIVE: To understand what PWLE/F and researchers perceive are important components to report on related to engagement in mental health and/or substance use research. METHODS: This study included a qualitative description study underpinned by pragmatism. Data were collected through virtual interviews with 13 PWLE/F and 12 researchers across Canada and analysed using template analysis. The results were used to develop a reporting guidance document for engagement in mental health and/or substance use research. RESULTS: The results from the template analysis were structured through the following themes: (1) establishing the need for a guidance document; (2) aspects of engagement to report and reflect on; (3) guidance around co-authorship with PWLE/F; (4) practical tips for reporting on engagement and (5) considerations for journals. Participants identified a need for tailored guidance that is flexible and reflective, yet can promote transparency, accountability and learning in the field. A reporting guidance document was developed for engagement in mental health and/or substance use research that balances flexibility and standardisation while incorporating reflection into reporting. Guidance around co-authorship with PWLE/F partners was also included. CONCLUSION: The guidance document is intended to be used as a roadmap to help guide authors to meaningfully write about engagement without the rigid boundaries of a reporting guideline. We encourage research teams that engage PWLE/F in mental health and/or substance use research to consider using the guidance document as they write up their work. PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: PWLE/F members were engaged throughout the study from conception to manuscript production. This included a PWLE partner on the doctoral committee and a Lived Experience Advisory Group consisting of two PWLE and one family partner
Accountability · Medical education · Mental health · Political science · Psychiatry · Psychotherapist · Qualitative research · Sociology · Substance use · Applied Psychology · Computer Science · Family Caregiving in Mental Illness · Health Policy Implementation Science · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Psychology
“Everyone had a Lovely Time”
The Many Faces of Engagement
Meta‐Research on the Science of Lived Experience Engagement in Mental Health and Substance Use Health Research
Gaps in the Engagement of People With Lived and Living Experience and Caregivers in Mental Health and Substance Use Health Research
Tools and Resources for Engaging People With Lived and Living Experience and Caregivers in Mental Health and Substance Use Research
‘Every Voice Matters’
A Case Study of Veteran Patient‐Researcher Partnerships in Mental Health Research and Practice
A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient and Public Involvement on Service Users, Researchers and Communities
Doing Template Analysis
GRIPP2 reporting checklists
Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research
To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales
Generalizability in qualitative research
Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research
Implementation of a youth‐adult partnership model in youth mental health systems research
An empirically based conceptual framework for fostering meaningful patient engagement in research
Lived experience and family engagement in psychiatry research
Exploring the impact of engagement in mental health and substance use research
Youth engagement in mental health research
Pragmatism as a paradigm for patient‐oriented research
Why the Qualitative Health Research (QHR) Review Process Does Not Use Checklists
Reporting guidelines for qualitative research
The Utility of Template Analysis in Qualitative Psychology Research
Employing a Qualitative Description Approach in Health Care Research
Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies
| Obras citantes distintas | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 7 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 5 |