QMiP statement on controversial Qualitative Research publication
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19550008 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Claire R Melia (0000-0001-7929-3587), Claire Melia, Deborah Bailey‐Rodriguez (0000-0002-9931-563X), Deborah Bailey-Rodriguez |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue | 34 |
| Pages | 5-5 |
| Publication date | 2022-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | QMiP Bulletin (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2044-0820 • E-ISSN: 2396-9598 |
| Publisher | British Psychological Society (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.53841/bpsqmip.2022.1.34.5 |
| OpenAlex | W4327649122 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
Many, if not all, of our readers will be aware of the controversial paper which was published earlier this year, often referred to as ‘that paper’. As a committee, QMiP have discussed internally and produced the below statement which we have posted online in response to ongoing discussions. We are reproducing this here for transparency and to ensure this is available to as many QMiP members as possible. We hope the below statement makes the position of the QMiP committee clear; whilst we do not agree with nor condone the approaches used in this instance, this should not take away from the high-quality qualitative research that takes place in our field and which we seek to champion
Champion · Political science · Public relations · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · Law · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Participatory Visual Research Methods · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
| Highly cited | No |
|---|