Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Early evaluation of a screen-and-treat strategy using high-risk HPV testing for Uganda

Implications for screening coverage and treatment

Bibliographic Data

ID19552441
AuthorsMarat Sultanov (0000-0002-5746-811X, University Medical Center Groningen), Jurjen van der Schans (0000-0001-6170-1191, University Medical Center Groningen), Jaap Koot (0000-0002-6933-0302, University Medical Center Groningen), Jaap AR Koot, Marcel J W Greuter (0000-0001-5721-9159, University Medical Center Groningen), Marcel JW Greuter, Janine de Zeeuw (0000-0002-7979-9366, University Medical Center Groningen), Carolyn Nakisige (0000-0002-1497-8056, Uganda Cancer Institute), Jogchum J Beltman, Jogchum Beltman (0000-0002-0048-7360, Leiden University Medical Center), Marlieke de Fouw (0000-0002-4488-4886, Leiden University Medical Center), Jelle Stekelenburg (0000-0002-2732-6620, University Medical Center Groningen), Geertruida H de Bock (0000-0003-3104-4471, University Medical Center Groningen)
Year2024
Volume14
Pages04157-04157
Publication date2024-09-20
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Global Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2047-2978 • E-ISSN: 2047-2986
PublisherInternational Society of Global Health (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.7189/jogh.14.04157
PMID39302149
OpenAlexW4402679410
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited33

Background: Uganda has a high burden of cervical cancer and its current coverage of screening based on visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) is low. High-risk HPV (hrHPV) testing is recommended by the World Health Organization as part of the global elimination strategy for cervical cancer. In this context, country-specific health economic evaluations can inform national-level decisions regarding implementation. We evaluated the recommended hrHPV screen-and-treat strategy to determine the minimum required levels of coverage and treatment adherence, as well as the maximum price level per test, for the strategy to be cost-effective in Uganda. Methods: We conducted a headroom analysis to estimate potential room for spending on implementing the hrHPV screen-and-treat strategy at different levels of coverage and treatment adherence (from 10% to 100%) at each screening round, and at different price levels of the hrHPV test. We compared the strategy with the existing VIA-based screen-and-treat policy in Uganda. We calculated headroom as the product of number of life years gained by the strategy and the willingness-to-pay threshold, minus the incremental costs incurred by the strategy. Positive headroom was interpreted as an indication of cost-effectiveness. Results: Compared with VIA-based screening with low 5% coverage, the hrHPV screen-and-treat strategy required at least 30% coverage and adherence for positive mean headroom, and compared with 30% VIA-based screening coverage, the minimum levels were 60%. At 60% coverage and adherence, the maximum acceptable price per hrHPV test was found to be between 15 and 30 international dollars. Conclusions: The hrHPV-based screen-and-treat strategy could be cost-effective in Uganda if the screening coverage and treatment adherence are at least 30% in each screening round, and if the price per test is set below 30 international dollars. The minimum required levels of screening coverage and adherence to treatment provide potential starting points for decision-makers in planning the rollout of hrHPV testing. The headroom estimates can guide the planning costs of screening infrastructure and campaigns to achieve the required coverage and treatment adherence in Uganda

Biology · Intensive care medicine · Medical physics · MEDLINE · Cervical Cancer and HPV Research · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Medicine · Reproductive tract infections research

  • The effect of hrHPV prevalence on cervical cancer screening strategies

    Open Access•Fengming Pan, Jurjen van der Schans et al.•BMC Public Health•2025

  • Global estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2020

    Open Access•Deependra Singh, Jerome Vignat et al.•The Lancet Global Health•2023

  • Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-years for 32 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2015

    Christina Fitzmaurice, Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration et al.•JAMA Oncology•2017

  • Global Cancer Statistics 2020

    Open Access•Hyuna Sung, Adalberto M Filho et al.•CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians•2021

  • An Introduction to the Main Types of Economic Evaluations Used for Informing Priority Setting and Resource Allocation in Healthcare

    Open Access•Hugo C Turner, Rachel A Archer et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2021

  • Does self-sampling for human papilloma virus testing have the potential to increase cervical cancer screening? An updated meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized clinical trials

    Open Access•Gianfranco Di Gennaro, Francesca Licata et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2022

  • Perceptions of key informants on the provision of cervical cancer prevention and control programme in Uganda

    Open Access•James Henry Obol, Reema Harrison et al.•BMC Public Health•2020

  • Investigating feasibility of 2021 WHO protocol for cervical cancer screening in underscreened populations

    Open Access•Marat Sultanov, Janine de Zeeuw et al.•BMC Public Health•2022

  • Cost-effectiveness of an HPV self-collection campaign in Uganda

    Open Access•Nicole G Campos, Vivien Tsu et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2017

Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae