Mapping the flow of conservation information across Wisconsin farming communities
Evidence from a social network analysis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19583192 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sophia Winkler‐Schor (0000-0002-3120-0772, Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences University of Illinois Urbana‐Champaign Urbana Illinois USA), Sophia Winkler-Schor (Illinois Department of Natural Resources, corresponding author), Heather D Craska (0009-0001-3415-8880, Illinois Department of Natural Resources), Marin E Skidmore (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign), Chloe B Wardropper (0000-0002-0652-2315, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 2304-2316 |
| Publication date | 2026-05-15 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | People and Nature (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2575-8314 • E-ISSN: 2575-8314 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/pan3.70350 |
| OpenAlex | W7161304301 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 58 |
Adoption of conservation practices in US agriculture remains limited despite demonstrated environmental and social benefits. Farmer demonstration programmes aim to accelerate conservation adoption by leveraging peer‐to‐peer learning, yet there are unresolved questions about how conservation information moves through farming communities. We used social network analysis, hierarchical clustering and regression modelling to examine communication patterns among 45 farmers in a demonstration farm program in Wisconsin. Programme managers, rather than demonstration farmers, emerged as the most central actors in information networks. Spatial proximity and shared programme regions predicted connections between farmers, underscoring the role of geography in communication patterns. Cluster analyses revealed two groups: socially connected "conservation leaders" who adopted cover crops on more acreage and "conservation curious", who were both less socially connected and less engaged in conservation. Findings underscore the importance of geographic proximity and social connectedness for effective programme design. Strengthening demonstration farmers' engagement with their communities and aligning outreach with existing social networks could enhance conservation adoption. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog
Agriculture · Information flow · Network analysis · Outreach · Social connectedness · Social network (sociolinguistics) · Social network analysis · Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development · Organic Food and Agriculture
Innovating together
Complex contagions
Identifying Opinion Leaders to Promote Behavior Change
The big five personality traits and environmental engagement
A General Coefficient of Similarity and Some of Its Properties
Experimental evidence for tipping points in social convention
Planetary boundaries
Silhouettes
A network approach for managing ecosystem services and improving food and nutrition security on smallholder farms
Hub‐and‐spoke social networks among Indonesian cocoa farmers homogenise farming practices
From values to actions in agriculture
Connecting sea to market
A Graph-theoretic perspective on centrality
Spatial patterns of organic agriculture adoption
Longitudinal Network Analysis on a Farmers’ Community of Practice and Their Changes in Agricultural Systems Management
Conservation behavior over time
Forester networks
A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains
Adoption as a social marker
Education Through Farm Demonstration
Collecting egocentric network data with visual tools
Network Data and Measurement
| Highly cited | No |
|---|