Towards an international research agenda for public health advocacy
Practice, preparedness and knowledge gaps
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19591556 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Katherine Cullerton (0000-0001-9517-6380, The University of Queensland), Kelly D’cunha (0000-0003-3552-1714, The University of Queensland), Chloe C Astbury (0000-0003-2955-7833, York University, corresponding author), Daniel Hunt (0000-0003-0755-7015, The University of Queensland), Alexandra J Bhatti (Macquarie University), Alexandra Bhatti (0000-0002-1031-2206), Richmond Aryeetey (0000-0003-4667-592X, University of Ghana) |
| Editors | Baldeep Kaur Dhaliwal |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | e0005713 |
| Publication date | 2026-01-23 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | PLOS Global Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2767-3375 • E-ISSN: 2767-3375 |
| Publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005713 |
| PMID | 41575929 |
| OpenAlex | W7125601060 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 24 |
Advocacy is a core function of public health practice and is essential for advancing population health, whether by promoting preventative measures or encouraging evidence-based policy reform. However, public health advocates, globally, face considerable barriers, including limited knowledge of effective strategies, resource constraints (such as time and funding), low prioritisation within organisations, and interference from powerful commercial industries seeking to impede policy change. To better support advocacy efforts, we sought to understand global advocacy practices, identify effective strategies, and determine where additional resources or evidence are most needed. We conducted an online cross-sectional survey with 156 self-identified public health advocates across 36 countries. Most respondents (80%) reported engaging in advocacy regularly, dedicating approximately half of their work time on related activities. Working in coalitions on policy issues was one of the most frequently used and effective strategies. While 61% of respondents felt well-equipped with advocacy knowledge, many reported gaps in other areas of preparedness, including insufficient funding, lack of time, limited access to networks, and gaps in advocacy skills, particularly regarding engaging with industry. Notably, respondents from middle-income countries reported higher self-assessed advocacy skills than those from low- or high-income countries. These findings highlight the need for tailored support and resources, particularly in relation to capacity building and evidence generation. In response, we propose a research agenda to address the most pressing issues facing public health advocates, globally
Policy advocacy · Population · Population health · Preparedness · Public health · Public policy · Resource (disambiguation) · Work (physics) · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Health Policy Implementation Science · Public Health Policies and Education · Health Policy
Qualitative Research
Profits and pandemics
Qualitative content analysis in nursing research
Snowball Sampling
Public health practitioners as policy advocates
Inside a corporate affairs conference
Public health advocacy strategies to influence policy agendas
Civil society
A proposal for systematic monitoring of the commercial determinants of health
Joining the dots
Plain tobacco packaging
Playing the policy game
Does public health advocacy seek to redress health inequities? A scoping review
The Decline of Local News and Its Effects
Academic advocacy in public health
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |