Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Land-Management Options for Greenhouse Gas Removal and Their Impacts on Ecosystem Services and the Sustainable Development Goals

Bibliographic Data

ID19598646
AuthorsPete Smith (0000-0002-3784-1124, University of Aberdeen), Justin Adams (World Economic Forum), David J Beerling (0000-0003-1869-4314, University of Sheffield), Tim Beringer (0000-0002-5567-8738, Integrative Research Institute on Transformations of Human Environment Systems (IRI THESys), Humboldt University of Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany), Katherine Calvin (0000-0003-2191-4189, Joint Global Change Research Institute), Katherine V Calvin (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Joint Global Change Research Institute, College Park, Maryland 20740, USA), Sabine Fuss (0000-0002-8681-9839, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin), Bronson W Griscom (0000-0002-8496-7213, The Nature Conservancy), Bronson Griscom (The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia 22203, USA), Nikolas Hagemann (0000-0001-8005-9392, Ithaka Institute for Carbon Strategies), Claudia Kammann (0000-0001-7477-1279, Hochschule Geisenheim University), Florian Kraxner (0000-0003-3832-6236, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis), Jan C Minx (0000-0002-2862-0178, University of Leeds), Alexander Popp (0000-0001-9500-1986, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research), Phil Renforth (0000-0002-1460-9947, Heriot-Watt University), José Luis Vicente‐Vicente (0000-0003-3554-9354, Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change), Jose Luis Vicente Vicente (Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change, 10829 Berlin, Germany), Saskia Keesstra (0000-0003-4129-9080, University of Newcastle Australia)
Year2019
Volume44
Issue1
Pages255-286
Publication date2019-06-11
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAnnual Review of Environment and Resources (BOOK_SERIES)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1543-5938 • E-ISSN: 1545-2050
PublisherAnnual Reviews (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033129
OpenAlexW2949662106
LanguageEN
Citations received38
References cited129

Land-management options for greenhouse gas removal (GGR) include afforestation or reforestation (AR), wetland restoration, soil carbon sequestration (SCS), biochar, terrestrial enhanced weathering (TEW), and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). We assess the opportunities and risks associated with these options through the lens of their potential impacts on ecosystem services (Nature's Contributions to People; NCPs) and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). We find that all land-based GGR options contribute positively to at least some NCPs and SDGs. Wetland restoration and SCS almost exclusively deliver positive impacts. A few GGR options, such as afforestation, BECCS, and biochar potentially impact negatively some NCPs and SDGs, particularly when implemented at scale, largely through competition for land. For those that present risks or are least understood, more research is required, and demonstration projects need to proceed with caution. For options that present low risks and provide cobenefits, implementation can proceed more rapidly following no-regrets principles

Afforestation · Agroforestry · Bio-energy with carbon capture and storage · Biochar · Business · Carbon sequestration · Climate change mitigation · Economics · Ecosystem · Ecosystem services · Environmental protection · Environmental resource management · Greenhouse gas · Land management · Land use · Natural resource economics · Reforestation · Sustainable development · Sustainable land management · Waste management · Wetland · Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Engineering · Environmental Science · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy · Ecology

  • Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges

    Open Access•Nathalie Seddon, Alexandre M Chausson et al.•Philosophical Transactions of the…•2020

  • Integrated assessment of carbon dioxide removal portfolios

    Open Access•Solène Chiquier, Angelo Costa Gurgel et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • What influences the implementation of natural climate solutions? A systematic map and review of the evidence

    Open Access•Ingrid Schulte, Juliana Eggers et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2021

  • Satellite data archives reveal positive effects of peatland restoration

    Open Access•Iuliia Burdun, Mari Myllymäki et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • Deep uncertainty in carbon dioxide removal portfolios

    Open Access•Quirina Rodriguez Mendez, Felix Creutzig et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • Frameworks to assess climate change responses—a systematic analysis to enhance frameworks for carbon dioxide removal

    Open Access•Felix Gulde, Maximilian Witting et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • Biochar as a carbon dioxide removal strategy in integrated long-run mitigation scenarios

    Open Access•Candelaria Bergero, Marshall Wise et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2024

  • Sustainable scale-up of negative emissions technologies and practices

    Open Access•Selene Cobo, Valentina Negri et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2022

  • Potentials and barriers to land-based mitigation technologies and practices (LMTs)—a review

    Open Access•Lokendra Karki, Jenny Lieu et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2023

  • Ecological impacts of temperature overshoot

    Open Access•Andreas L S Meyer, Christopher H Trisos•One Earth•2023

  • A biblio-ecological study on sustainable land planning research

    Open Access•Giovanna Morelli, Antonia Rosa Gurrieri et al.•Socio-Economic Planning Sciences•2026

  • Linkages between Soil Security and One Health

    Open Access•Tom Swan, Alex B Mcbratney et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2024

  • Global hotspots of climate-related disasters

    Open Access•Camila I Donatti, Kristina Nicholas et al.•International Journal of Disaster…•2024

  • Diverse carbon dioxide removal approaches could reduce impacts on the energy–water–land system

    Open Access•Jay Fuhrman, Candelaria Bergero et al.•Nature Climate Change•2023

  • Carbon‐dioxide Removal and Biodiversity

    Open Access•Kate Dooley, Ellycia Harrould‐kolieb et al.•Global Policy•2021

  • Understanding the balance between soil conservation and soil water storage capacity during the process of vegetation restoration in semi‐arid watersheds in the Loess Plateau, China

    Open Access•Yang Yu, Ruipeng Zhu et al.•Land Degradation and Development•2023

  • Enhancing landscape planning

    Open Access•Michael Kleyer•Landscape and Urban Planning•2021

  • Does ‘net zero’ mean zero cows

    Open Access•John Lynch, Raymond T Pierrehumbert•Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists•2024

  • Women-led sustainable innovation in small island agriculture

    Open Access•Sanaz Nikghadam-Hojjati, Eda Marchetti et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2026

  • Projecting a food insecure world

    Open Access•Sreeja Jaiswal, Aravindhan Nagarajan et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2024

  • Factors influencing winegrowers’ adoption of soil organic carbon sequestration practices in France

    Open Access•Florian Thomas Payen, Dominic Moran et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2021

  • Exploring alternative pathways toward more sustainable regional food systems by foodshed assessment – City region examples from Vienna and Bristol

    Open Access•José Luis Vicente‐Vicente, Alexandra Doernberg et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2021

  • A way forward for climate technology transfer and sustainable development goals

    Open Access•Whijin Kim, Cholho Song et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2023

  • Conceptual framework for balancing society and nature in net-zero energy transitions

    Open Access•Gemma Delafield, Caspar Donnison et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2021

  • Global forces of change

    Open Access•Priya Shyamsundar, Laura Aileen Sauls et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2021

  • The policy discourse on negative emissions, land-based technologies, and the Global South

    Open Access•Gregor Jaschke, Felix Biermann et al.•Global Environmental Change•2022

  • Greenhouse gas emissions from Mediterranean agriculture

    Open Access•Eduardo Aguilera, Carolina Reyes-Palomo et al.•Global Environmental Change•2021

  • Macro-level economic and environmental sustainability of negative emission technologies; Case study of crushed silicate production for enhanced weathering

    Open Access•Eunice Oppon, J Richter et al.•Ecological Economics•2022

  • The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals

    Open Access•Louis J Kotzé, Richard E Kim et al.•The Political Impact of the…•2022

  • The role of soil carbon in natural climate solutions

    Open Access•Deborah Bossio, Susan C Cook‐Patton et al.•Nature Sustainability•2020

  • Global evidence of human well-being and biodiversity impacts of natural climate solutions

    Open Access•Charlotte H Chang, James T Erbaugh et al.•Nature Sustainability•2024

  • Relationship between land urbanization and the ecosystem service value of land

    Open Access•Hongyuan Du, Maogang Tang et al.•Environment Development and…•2024

  • A social network analysis regarding conservation agro-ecological efficiency in China

    Open Access•Guangjian Hou, Yuanyuan Li et al.•Environment Development and…•2024

  • Community sawmills can save forests

    Open Access•Daniela A Miteva, Edward A Ellis et al.•Ecological Economics•2025

  • The need for local governance of global commons

    Open Access•Christine Merk, Jonas Grunau et al.•Ecological Economics•2022

  • Energy potentials, negative emissions, and spatially explicit environmental impacts of perennial grasses on abandoned cropland in Europe

    Open Access•Cristina Maria Iordan, Cristina-Maria Iordan et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2023

  • The future of Southeast Asia's tropical peatlands

    Open Access•Lydia E S Cole, Katherine J Willis et al.•Anthropocene•2021

  • Advocating afforestation, betting on BECCS

    Pamela Mcelwee•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2023

  • Soil and human security in the 21st century

    Open Access•Ronald Amundson, Asmeret Asefaw Berhe et al.•Science•2015

  • Natural climate solutions

    Open Access•Bronson W Griscom, Justin Adams et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2017

  • Trading Water for Carbon with Biological Carbon Sequestration

    Open Access•Robert B Jackson, Esteban G Jobbágy et al.•Science•2005

  • Factors of Soil Formation

    Hans Jenny•Soil Science•1941

  • Climate-smart soils

    Open Access•K Paustian, Johannes Lehmann et al.•Nature•2016

  • Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary? A global assessment

    Open Access•Tim Newbold, Lawrence N Hudson et al.•Science•2016

  • Carbon-Negative Biofuels from Low-Input High-Diversity Grassland Biomass

    Open Access•D Tilman, Jason Hill et al.•Science•2006

  • Biodiversity

    Open Access•Sean Maxwell, Sean L Maxwell et al.•Nature•2016

  • A Large and Persistent Carbon Sink in the World’s Forests

    Open Access•Yude Pan, Richard A Birdsey et al.•Science•2011

  • Mining and poverty reduction

    Open Access•Scott Pegg•Journal of Cleaner Production•2006

  • How much land‐based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals?

    Open Access•Pete Smith, H Haberl et al.•Global Change Biology•2013

  • The significance of soils and soil science towards realization of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals

    Open Access•Saskia D Keesstra, Saskia Keesstra et al.•SOIL•2016

  • Bioenergy and climate change mitigation

    Open Access•Felix Creutzig, N H Ravindranath et al.•GCB Bioenergy•2015

  • Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability

    Open Access•David R Montgomery•Proceedings of the National…•2007

  • Environmental and Economic Costs of Soil Erosion and Conservation Benefits

    Open Access•David Pimentel, Celia A Harvey et al.•Science•1995

  • Wetland Resources

    Open Access•Joy B Zedler, Suzanne Kercher•Annual Review of Environment and…•2005

  • Assessing nature's contributions to people

    Open Access•Sandra Díaz, Sandra Dı́az et al.•Science•2018

  • Biogeochemical potential of biomass pyrolysis systems for limiting global warming to 1.5 °C

    Open Access•Constanze Werner, Hanns-Peter Schmidt et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2018

  • Large-scale bioenergy production

    Open Access•Florian Humpenöder, Alexander Popp et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2017

  • Biochar alters the resistance and resilience to drought in a tropical soil

    Open Access•Chenfei Liang, Xiaolin Zhu et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2014

  • Biochar boosts tropical but not temperate crop yields

    Open Access•Simon Jeffery, Diego Ábalos et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2017

  • Negative emissions—Part 2

    Open Access•Sabine Fuss, William F Lamb et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2018

  • Negative emissions—Part 1

    Open Access•Jan C Minx, William F Lamb et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2018

  • Afforestation to mitigate climate change

    Open Access•Ulrich Kreidenweis, Florian Humpenöder et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2016

  • The ecological basis for economic value of seafood production supported by mangrove ecosystems

    Open Access•Patrik Rönnbäck•Ecological Economics•1999

  • A multi-model assessment of food security implications of climate change mitigation

    Open Access•Shinichiro Fujimori, Tomoko Hasegawa et al.•Nature Sustainability•2019

  • Soils and climate change

    Open Access•Pete Smith•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2012

  • Soil as a filter for groundwater quality

    Open Access•Saskia Keesstra, Violette Geissen et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2012

  • Agroforestry solutions to address food security and climate change challenges in Africa

    Open Access•Cheikh Mbow, Meine Van Noordwijk et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2013

  • Mapping certified forests for sustainable management - A global tool for information improvement through participatory and collaborative mapping

    Open Access•Florian Kraxner, Dmitry Schepaschenko et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2017

  • Changes in the global value of ecosystem services

    Open Access•R Costanza, R S De Groot et al.•Global Environmental Change•2014

  • Better air for better health

    Open Access•Shilpa Rao, Saroj Pachauri et al.•Global Environmental Change•2013

  • Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways

    Open Access•Alexander Popp, Katherine Calvin et al.•Global Environmental Change•2016

  • Increasing flood risk and wetland losses due to global sea-level rise

    Open Access•Robert J Nicholls, R Nicholls et al.•Global Environmental Change•1999

Unique citing works38
Citations per year6.33
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 38

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae