Kinds of Learning and the Likelihood of Future True Beliefs
Reply to Jäger on Reliabilism and the Value Problem
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20141967 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Erik J Olsson (0000-0002-4207-3721, Lund University), Martin L Jönsson (0000-0002-5864-3223, Lund University) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 77 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 214-222 |
| Publication date | 2011-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Theoria (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0040-5825 • E-ISSN: 1755-2567 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1755-2567.2011.01103.x |
| OpenAlex | W1721813775 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 7 |
We reply to Christoph Jäger's criticism of the conditional probability solution (CPS) to the value problem for reliabilism due to Goldman and Olsson (2009). We argue that while Jäger raises some legitimate concerns about the compatibility of CPS with externalist epistemology, his objections do not in the end reduce the plausibility of that solution
Criticism · Economics · Epistemology · Externalism · Mathematical economics · Political science · Statistics · Value (mathematics) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,27 |
| Citation span | 2011 - 2021 (11) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |