The Precision Medicine Nation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20335992 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Maya Sabatello (0000-0003-4444-5389), Leon Wenliang Zhong (Hong Kong University of Science and Technology), Paul S Appelbaum, Peter Appelbaum (0000-0002-1940-0042), James Tin-Yau Kwok (0000-0002-4828-8248, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 19-29 |
| Publication date | 2017-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Hastings Center Report (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0093-0334 • E-ISSN: 1552-146X |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/hast.736 |
| OpenAlex | W28749054 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 16 |
| References cited | 62 |
The United States’ ambitious Precision Medicine Initiative proposes to accelerate exponentially the adoption of precision medicine, an approach to health care that tailors disease diagnosis, treatment, and prevention to individual variability in genes, environment, and lifestyle. It aims to achieve this by creating a cohort of volunteers for precision medicine research, accelerating biomedical research innovation, and adopting policies geared toward patients’ empowerment. As strategies to implement the PMI are formulated, critical consideration of the initiative's ethical and sociopolitical dimensions is needed. Drawing on scholarship of nationalism and democracy, we discuss the PMI's construction of what we term “genomic citizenship”; the possible normative obligations arising therefrom; and the ethical, legal, and social challenges that will ensue. Although the PMI is a work in progress, discussion of the existing and emerging issues can facilitate the development of policies, structures, and procedures that can maximize the initiative's ability to produce equitable and socially sensitive outcomes. Our analysis can also be applied to other population‐based, precision medicine research programs
Artificial neural network · Brier score · Calibration · Isotonic regression · Machine learning · Overfitting · Random subspace method · Regression · Sigmoid function · Statistics · Blind Source Separation Techniques · Computer Science · Face and Expression Recognition · Mathematics · Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques · Artificial Intelligence
Cultivating inclusivity in precision medicine research
‘Being disabled’ as an exclusion criterion for clinical trials
The fertility of moral ambiguity in precision medicine
Precision medicine and the problem of structural injustice
Personalised medicine and the state
Contested futures
Appropriating Empowerment
Genomic Justice and Imagined Communities
The Precision Medicine Nation
One for All, All for One? Containing the Promise of Solidarity in Precision Medicine
Precision medicine ‘versus’ or ‘for’ public health? Different configurations of precision medicine in relation to the social determinants of health
Imagining the public
Precision patients
Digital phenotyping and data inheritance
Recent scientific/intellectual movements in biomedicine
Toward labor-sensitive research
The Cultural Defense
Democracy and Expertise
The therapeutic misconception
An introduction to ROC analysis
Science and citizenship
Participation and competence as joint components in a cross-national analysis of scientific citizenship
From “Personalized” to “Precision” Medicine
Have We Asked Too Much of Consent
The Precision Medicine Nation
Models of Consent to Return of Incidental Findings in Genomic Research
Genetics and democracy—what is the issue
If I Could in a Small Way Help”
Latino Beliefs About Biomedical Research Participation
Biobanks, national identity and imagined communities
Women and resistance in East Timor
Rights and Responsibilities in the New Genetics Era
The Therapeutic Misconception
And They Think I'm Just a Nice Old Lady' Women and War in Belfast, Northern Ireland
Return of the Citizen
Scientific citizenship in a democratic society
Genetics and citizenship
Patients-in-Waiting
| Unique citing works | 16 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,78 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2026 (10) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 16 |