GenAI and misinformation in education
A systematic scoping review of opportunities and challenges
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20397654 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ali Fulsher (University of Minnesota System, corresponding author), Marianna Pagkratidou (0000-0002-0161-1554, University of Minnesota System, corresponding author), Panayiota Kendeou (0000-0002-0392-7659, University of Minnesota System, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 1373-1385 |
| Publication date | 2026-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | AI & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0951-5666 • E-ISSN: 1435-5655 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s00146-025-02536-y |
| OpenAlex | W4413044515 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 68 |
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has emerged as a transformative and disruptive force in education and society, with the potential to both create and correct misinformation. In education, misinformation manifests at three levels: the individual (when students hold misconceptions or inaccurate beliefs); the community (when groups of individuals share the same misconceptions or inaccurate beliefs); and the system (when educational policies and practices are not based on scientific evidence). We conducted a systematic scoping review to identify existing challenges and opportunities for misinformation generation, sharing, and correction across these levels in education, as well as inform future research in this area of work. Our results indicate three approaches to GenAI and misinformation in education: identifying misconceptions, prebunking , and (re)producing misinformation, with most research conducted at the individual level. We conclude with suggestions for future research and practice
Engineering ethics · Medical education · Misinformation · Pedagogy · Political science · Public relations · Transformative learning · Engineering · Medicine · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Online Learning and Analytics · Psychology · Topic Modeling
Fact-check misinformation by generative artificial intelligence
Enhancing students’ critical thinking literacy in a generative AI context
Assets and Threats of Generative AI in Higher Education
The relationship between AI-chatbots use, student assessment performance and learning outcomes in higher education
Tres escenarios para la IA en educación
Age differences in susceptibility to stroke-related health misinformation on social media
Integrating Generative AI in Engineering Education
Conceptualisation of human–AI dialogue in/for an educational semiosphere
Ontological capture
Transforming Education
Durably reducing conspiracy beliefs through dialogues with AI
Students’ voices on generative AI
The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making
Infodemics and health misinformation
Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Opinion Paper
ChatGPT in education
Prompt engineering as a new 21st century skill
What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature
The impact of Generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and research direction in education
Unlocking the potential of GPT-3 in education
Lateral reading on the open Internet
Using conceptual change theory to help preservice teachers understand dyslexia
The potential effects of deepfakes on news media and entertainment
Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation
Old dog, new tricks? Exploring the potential functionalities of ChatGPT in supporting educational methods in social psychiatry
Can News Literacy Help Reduce Belief in Covid Misinformation
Personalized learning
Defining Misinformation and Understanding its Bounded Nature
Promises and challenges of generative artificial intelligence for human learning
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 9 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |