Philosophy of science and the formalization of psychological theory

Bibliographic Data

ID20402011
AuthorsMarkus I Eronen (0000-0003-2028-3338, University of Groningen, corresponding author), Jan-Willem Romeijn (0000-0001-5711-7021, University of Groningen)
Year2020
Volume30
Issue6
Pages786-799
Publication date2020-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTheory & Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0959-3543 • E-ISSN: 1461-7447
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0959354320969876
OpenAlexW3117263522
LanguageEN
Citations received12
References cited39

One of the original aims of this journal was to promote theory in psychology. Nowadays more and more psychological researchers are calling for more theory development, and articles on the “theory crisis” have also found their way into mainstream journals. In this article, we provide a further perspective to this theory debate. Over the past century, philosophy of science has staged extensive discussions on the mathematization of nature and on the role of mathematics in the development of theory and the connection of theory to empirical facts. We show that these discussions are highly relevant for the current debate in psychology. In particular, we emphasize the importance of conceptual work in the process of mathematization, and the role of mathematics in co-ordinating theory and observations. We then discuss the implications that these points have for statistically oriented psychology in general and for the recent theory debate in psychology

Cognitive science · Development theory · Empirical psychology · Epistemology · Mainstream · Philosophy of psychology · Philosophy of science · Psychological Theory · Sociology · Theoretical psychology · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Computer Science · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Psychology · Quantum Mechanics and Applications · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access