Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Variations in the use of simple and context-sensitive grapheme-phoneme correspondences in English and German developing readers

Bibliographic Data

ID20478555
AuthorsXenia Schmalz (0000-0002-3365-257X, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, corresponding author), Serje Robidoux (0000-0002-4581-3297, Macquarie University), Anne Castles (0000-0001-8228-8260, Macquarie University), Eva Marinus (0000-0002-3628-0695, Schwyz University of Teacher Education)
Year2020
Volume70
Issue2
Pages180-199
Publication date2020-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAnnals of Dyslexia (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0736-9387 • E-ISSN: 1934-7243
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11881-019-00189-3
PMID31955322
OpenAlexW2999064000
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited32

Learning to read in most alphabetic orthographies requires not only the acquisition of simple grapheme-phoneme correspondences (GPCs) but also the acquisition of context-sensitive GPCs, where surrounding letters change a grapheme’s pronunciation. We aimed to explore the use and development of simple GPCs (e.g. a ➔ /æ/) and context-sensitive GPCs (e.g. [w]a ➔ /ɔ/, as in “swan” or a[l][d ] ➔ /o:/, as in “bald”) in pseudoword reading. Across three experiments, English- and German-speaking children in grades 2–4 read aloud pseudowords, where vowel graphemes had different pronunciations according to different contexts (e.g. “hact”, “wact”, “hald”). First, we found that children use context-sensitive GPCs from grade 2 onwards, even when they are not explicitly taught. Second, we used a mathematical optimisation procedure to assess whether children’s vowel responses can be described by assuming that they rely on a mix of simple and context-sensitive GPCs. While the approach works well for German adults (Schmalz et al. in Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26 , 831–852, 2014), we found poor model fits for both German- and English-speaking children. Additional analyses using an entropy measure and data from a third experiment showed that children’s pseudoword reading responses are variable and likely affected by random noise. We found a decrease in entropy across grade and reading ability across all conditions in both languages. This suggests that GPC knowledge becomes increasingly refined across grades 2–4

Cognition · German · Grapheme · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Neurolinguistics · Psycholinguistics · Computer Science · Digital Communication and Language · History · Neuroscience · Philosophy · Psychology · Reading and Literacy Development · Writing and Handwriting Education

  • How we should measure orthographic depth

    Open Access•Xenia Schmalz, Jay G Rueckl et al.•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2026

  • Capitalizing on the promise of item-level analyses to inform new understandings of word reading development

    Open Access•Laura M Steacy, Ihosvani Baños Hernández•Annals of Dyslexia•2020

  • The Structure of English Orthography

    Richard L Venezky•Structure of English Orthography•1970

  • DMDX

    Open Access•Kenneth I Forster, Jonathan C Forster•Behavior Research Methods,…•2003

  • Understanding normal and impaired word reading

    David C Plaut, James L Mcclelland et al.•Psychological Review•1996

  • Phonological recoding and self-teaching

    Open Access•David L Share•Cognition•1995

  • Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories

    Conrad Perry, Johannes C Ziegler et al.•Psychological Review•2007

  • Ending the Reading Wars

    Open Access•Anne Castles, Kathleen Rastle et al.•Psychological Science in the…•2018

  • The English Lexicon Project

    Open Access•David A Balota, Melvin J Yap et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2007

  • DRC

    Max Coltheart, Kathleen Rastle et al.•Psychological Review•2001

  • A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.

    Mark S Seidenberg, James L Mcclelland•Psychological Review•1989

  • Rule and analogy mechanisms in reading nonwords

    Sally Andrews, Danielle R Scarratt•Journal of Experimental…•1998

  • Rule and analogy mechanisms in reading nonwords

    Sally Andrews, Danielle R Scarratt•Journal of Experimental…•1998

  • Word-initial entropy in five languages

    Susanne R Borgwaldt, Frauke M Hellwig et al.•Written Language & Literacy•2005

  • The Nonword Reading Deficit in Developmental Dyslexia

    John P Rack, John Rack et al.•Reading Research Quarterly•1992

  • Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies

    Open Access•Philip H K Seymour, Mikko Aro et al.•British Journal of Psychology•2003

  • Australian English

    Open Access•Felicity Cox, Sallyanne Palethorpe•Journal of the International…•2007

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae