Activists in the dark
Social media algorithms and collective action in two social movement organizations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20501014 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Meghan Etter (0000-0002-8721-7821, King's College London, corresponding author), Michael Etter (King's College London), Oana Brindusa Albu (0000-0002-5539-003X, Copenhagen Business School) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 68-91 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Organization (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1350-5084 • E-ISSN: 1461-7323 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1350508420961532 |
| OpenAlex | W3091170644 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 48 |
| References cited | 43 |
It is widely established that social media afford social movement (SM) organizations new ways of organizing. Critical studies point out, however, that social media use may also trigger negative repercussions due to the commercial interests that are designed into these technologies. Yet empirical evidence about these matters is scarce. In this article, we investigate how social media algorithms influence activists’ actualization of collective affordances. Empirically, we build on an ethnographic study of two SM organizations based in Tunisia. The contributions of this paper are twofold. Firstly, we provide a theoretical framework that specifies how algorithms condition the actualization of three collective affordances (interlinking, assembling, augmenting). Specifically, we show how these affordances are supported by algorithmic facilitation , that is, operations pertaining to the sorting of interactions and actors, the filtering of information, and the ranking and aggregation of content. Secondly, we extend the understanding of how social media platforms’ profit-orientation undermines collective action. Namely, we identify how algorithms introduce constraints for organizing processes, manifested as algorithmic distortion , that is, information overload, opacity, and disinformation. We conclude by discussing the detrimental implications of social media algorithms for organizing and civic engagement, as activists are often unaware of the interests of social media-owning corporations
Affordance · Algorithm · Collective action · Human–computer interaction · Information overload · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Social media · Social movement · Sociology · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Social Media and Politics
Algorithmic Resistance in Europe and the Question of Collective Agency
Algorithms of Resistance
Reconsidering communication visibility in politically restrictive contexts
GlobalJustice
Deciding what’s (sharable) news
“You Belong to Gutters, Not Facebook or Twitter”
Revolutions and Movements for Radical Social Change
Injustice épistémique et démocratie délibérative à l’ère du numérique
Affective authority, gender, and platformed communication
Sport, Social Movements, and New Media
Digital resource abundance
What is an Online Community? Conceptual and Methodological Considerations
Algorithmic Media
Authenticity, activism, and the attention economy
Totally Administered Heteronomy
Exploring the dark and bright sides of Internet democracy
Peer-to-peer online voice as emergent collective action
ONG y Redes Sociales
The Role of Changes on Twitter in Youth Political Participation
Stuck With the Algorithm
Subversive Recipes for Communication for Development and Social Change in Times of Digital Capitalism
It Listens to Me So I Feel Well and Connected
Twitter as a leadership actor — A communication as constitutive of organizing perspective on a ‘leaderless’ social movement
Human-automated collectives
Reshaping platform governmentality
Unpacking social media's role in sociopolitical development amidst the dual pandemics
Homophily and Insularity Dynamics in an Echo Chambers
Mirror, mirror on the screen, “Wherein can I find me?” – On the sublime qualities of AI recommendation systems, algorithm conformity, and the else
Exploring the dark and unexpected sides of digitalization
People on the tweets
Trolling the Leviathan
Online identities in and around organizations
Disconnective action
Programmable politics in the aftermaths of the pandemic
Mothers’ Digital Caring Labor as Climate Action
“If you don’t have a strong social media game, you might as well hang up your instrument”
Data, anecdotes, anecdotal data
Using Grounded Theory Method in Social Media Studies
Tercer sector, uso de redes sociales y activismo en España y Chile
No decision is permanent!’
Students' awareness and conceptions of science‐related communication mechanisms on social media
Amplification, evasion, hijacking
Like, Share, Lead
Platforms as Partners? Dissecting the Interplay Between Civil Society Organizing and Social Media Platforms
An Immaculate Keeper of My Social Media Feed
Ativismo Digital Para Além Da Comunicação
Algorithms as organizational figuration
Plataformas de redes sociais e trabalho doméstico remunerado no Brasil
Reasons for realism
From ranking algorithms to ‘ranking cultures’
Social Media and the Organization of Collective Action
Social Media and Their Affordances for Organizing
The Relevance of Algorithms
Social Media Affordances for Connective Action
From clicktivism to hacktivism
Understanding Social Media Logic
From social movements to cloud protesting
Digital media activities and mode of participation in a protest campaign
The algorithmic imaginary
Algorithmic decision-making? The user interface and its role for human involvement in decisions supported by artificial intelligence
On studying algorithms ethnographically
The organizational powers of (digital) media
‘We’re not run on Numbers, We’re People, We’re Emotional People’
The Materiality of Technology
Infoglut
The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects
Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook
Enterprise Social Media
From Wall Street to Wellington
Computing the everyday
Governance by algorithms
Naturalistic inquiry
Social Media
Algorithmic affordances for productive resistance
Was the Revolution Tweeted? Social Media and theJasmine Revolution inTunisia
High-frequency trader subjectivity
The Mangle in Practice
Digitally Mediated Protest
Years of Protest and Media Technologies Scholarship
When Algorithms Shape Collective Action
Imagined Affordance
Bugs, predations or manipulations? Incompatible epistemic regimes of high-frequency trading
| Unique citing works | 48 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 9,6 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 47 |