Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Do we have something to say? From re-search to roi-search and back again

Bibliographic Data

ID20501237
AuthorsMats Alvesson (0000-0001-8709-4684, Lund University, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume20
Issue1
Pages79-90
Publication date2013-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueOrganization (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1350-5084 • E-ISSN: 1461-7323
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1350508412460996
OpenAlexW2006806173
LanguageEN
Citations received22
References cited19

Research and publication are of the greatest importance to many academics. Publishing is essential for a number of reasons including material rewards and promotion, self-esteem and status, getting and retaining a job at a good university and, perhaps in some cases, reducing teaching load. As a collective I think we tend to become increasingly career-conscious, anxious about performance and assessments and instrumental about work and outcome. Of course, this is most salient for young people, but increasingly also senior persons like myself may feel that one is only as good as one’s latest journal article or book and increasingly aware of how much and in which journals we have published. This is certainly a drastic change from the past few decades. In this context, it appears vital to raise the question ‘do we have something to say?’. By ‘we’ I mean the parts of the OS community that have an ‘intellectual’ rather than a strong applied and managerial interest. (For ‘managerialists’, who wish to appeal to managers with technical knowledge, the situation is somewhat different from most OS people, who are more into ‘reflectionstimulating’ knowledge.) More broadly, the target is academics in management and organization, who are more inclined to look at journals such as Organization rather than Harvard Business Review. Of course, within this ‘we’ there are various groups. Much of what I am saying here may be less relevant for those struggling to get their bread and butter, and whose overriding concern may be about their CV and publication record in order to secure a position—and identity and status as someone who is a ‘real’ academic. But I think that most people should be concerned with more than just landing and keeping a job or experiencing acceptance and membership in academia; and thus having something to say should be vital. By ‘say’ I mean that there are knowledge contributions that an audience of people outside a specialized academic setting would be inclined to read and find interesting and relevant for their organizational life. This does not necessarily mean managers, but could be professionals, union representatives or general members of the public with some intellectual interest. To have something

Appeal · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Publishing · Sociology · History · Law · Management and Organizational Studies · Psychology

  • Por qué publicamos? Prevalencia, motivaciones y consecuencias de publicar o perecer

    Open Access•Manuel Goyanes, Eduardo Francisco Rodríguez Gómez•El Profesional de la Informacion•2018

  • Microsociología del profesor universitario

    Open Access•Antonio Fernández Vicente•Ámbitos Revista Internacional de…•2020

  • Gerencialismo universitario y publicación científica

    Open Access•Fernando Ampudia De Haro•Debats Revista de cultura poder i…•2019

  • University Managerialism and Scientific Publication

    Open Access•Fernando Ampudia De Haro•Debats Revista de cultura poder i…•2019

  • Is Management and Organizational Studies divided into (micro-)tribes

    Open Access•Oliver Wieczorek, Olof Hallonsten et al.•Scientometrics•2024

  • Deadly sins and corporate acquisitions

    Open Access•Svante Schriber, David R King et al.•Culture and Organization•2019

  • Embracing differences in organizations

    Mara Gorli, Marta Piria et al.•Culture and Organization•2024

  • The commoditization of the publication culture in Spain

    Open Access•Eduardo Francisco Rodríguez Gómez, Manuel Goyanes•El Profesional de la Informacion•2020

  • Creating meaningful connections

    Open Access•Daniel King, Martyn Griffin•Organization•2024

  • What do you mean? Linguistic sensitivity and relational reflexivity in scholarly writing

    Open Access•Iga Maria Lehman, Janne Tienari•Organization•2025

  • Confessions of an organizational space writer

    Open Access•Fabio James Petani•Organization•2019

  • Speaking truth to power? Anti-bureaucratic romanticism from critical organizational theorizing to the White House

    Open Access•Thomas Lopdrup-Hjorth, Paul Du Gay•Organization•2020

  • The politics of post-human technologies

    Open Access•Ismael Al‐amoudi•Organization•2023

  • Are we ethical? Approaches to ethics in management and organisation research

    Open Access•Emma Jeanes•Organization•2017

  • The ties that bind ? Exploring the basic principles of worker-owned organizations in practice

    Open Access•Iñaki Heras Saizarbitoria, Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria•Organization•2014

  • Post-capitalistic politics in the making

    Open Access•P Zanoni, Alessia Contu et al.•Organization•2017

  • Fear of the formal

    Paul Du Gay, Thomas Lopdrup-Hjorth•European Journal of Cultural and…•2016

  • Slipping into functional stupidity

    Open Access•Roland Paulsen•Human Relations•2017

  • Contextual constraints and the relevance discovery process

    Open Access•Andrei Kuznetsov, Olga Kuznetsova•International Social Science…•2016

  • O impacto de (não) ter impacto

    Open Access•Fernando Ampudia De Haro•Revista crítica de ciências…•2017

  • Object and objective lost

    Thomas Lopdrup-Hjorth•Journal of Cultural Economy•2015

  • Audio-visual production and shortcomings of distribution in organisation studies

    Martin Wood•Journal of Cultural Economy•2015

  • Constructing Research Questions

    Mats Alvesson, Jorgen Sandberg•Constructing Research Questions:…•2013

  • The Triumph of Emptiness

    Mats Alvesson•The Triumph of Emptiness•2013

  • Engineering Culture

    Gideon Kunda•Engineering Culture•1993

  • The Significance of Distinctiveness

    Open Access•Georg Schreyögg, Demetrius Geiger et al.•Organization•2007

  • Working at a Cynical Distance

    Open Access•Peter Fleming, André Spicer•Organization•2003

  • Journal list fetishism and the perversion of scholarship

    Open Access•Hugh Willmott•Organization•2011

  • Writing Differently

    Open Access•Christopher Grey, Amanda Sinclair et al.•Organization•2006

  • Advancing theory

    Open Access•Neal M Ashkanasy•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2011

  • Moral mazes

    Open Access•Robert Jackall•International Journal of Politics…•1988

  • Readers beware

    Open Access•C Hardy, David Grant•Human Relations•2012

  • Decolonializing discourse

    Open Access•Mats Alvesson, Dan Kärreman•Human Relations•2011

  • Critical performativity

    Open Access•André Spicer, Mats Alvesson et al.•Human Relations•2009

Unique citing works22
Citations per year1,83
Citation span2014 - 2025 (12)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 18

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae