Do we have something to say? From re-search to roi-search and back again
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20501237 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mats Alvesson (0000-0001-8709-4684, Lund University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 79-90 |
| Publication date | 2013-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Organization (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1350-5084 • E-ISSN: 1461-7323 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1350508412460996 |
| OpenAlex | W2006806173 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 22 |
| References cited | 19 |
Research and publication are of the greatest importance to many academics. Publishing is essential for a number of reasons including material rewards and promotion, self-esteem and status, getting and retaining a job at a good university and, perhaps in some cases, reducing teaching load. As a collective I think we tend to become increasingly career-conscious, anxious about performance and assessments and instrumental about work and outcome. Of course, this is most salient for young people, but increasingly also senior persons like myself may feel that one is only as good as one’s latest journal article or book and increasingly aware of how much and in which journals we have published. This is certainly a drastic change from the past few decades. In this context, it appears vital to raise the question ‘do we have something to say?’. By ‘we’ I mean the parts of the OS community that have an ‘intellectual’ rather than a strong applied and managerial interest. (For ‘managerialists’, who wish to appeal to managers with technical knowledge, the situation is somewhat different from most OS people, who are more into ‘reflectionstimulating’ knowledge.) More broadly, the target is academics in management and organization, who are more inclined to look at journals such as Organization rather than Harvard Business Review. Of course, within this ‘we’ there are various groups. Much of what I am saying here may be less relevant for those struggling to get their bread and butter, and whose overriding concern may be about their CV and publication record in order to secure a position—and identity and status as someone who is a ‘real’ academic. But I think that most people should be concerned with more than just landing and keeping a job or experiencing acceptance and membership in academia; and thus having something to say should be vital. By ‘say’ I mean that there are knowledge contributions that an audience of people outside a specialized academic setting would be inclined to read and find interesting and relevant for their organizational life. This does not necessarily mean managers, but could be professionals, union representatives or general members of the public with some intellectual interest. To have something
Appeal · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Publishing · Sociology · History · Law · Management and Organizational Studies · Psychology
Por qué publicamos? Prevalencia, motivaciones y consecuencias de publicar o perecer
Microsociología del profesor universitario
Gerencialismo universitario y publicación científica
University Managerialism and Scientific Publication
Is Management and Organizational Studies divided into (micro-)tribes
Deadly sins and corporate acquisitions
Embracing differences in organizations
The commoditization of the publication culture in Spain
Creating meaningful connections
What do you mean? Linguistic sensitivity and relational reflexivity in scholarly writing
Confessions of an organizational space writer
Speaking truth to power? Anti-bureaucratic romanticism from critical organizational theorizing to the White House
The politics of post-human technologies
Are we ethical? Approaches to ethics in management and organisation research
The ties that bind ? Exploring the basic principles of worker-owned organizations in practice
Post-capitalistic politics in the making
Fear of the formal
Slipping into functional stupidity
Contextual constraints and the relevance discovery process
O impacto de (não) ter impacto
Object and objective lost
Audio-visual production and shortcomings of distribution in organisation studies
Constructing Research Questions
The Triumph of Emptiness
Engineering Culture
The Significance of Distinctiveness
Working at a Cynical Distance
Journal list fetishism and the perversion of scholarship
Writing Differently
Advancing theory
Moral mazes
Readers beware
Decolonializing discourse
Critical performativity
| Unique citing works | 22 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,83 |
| Citation span | 2014 - 2025 (12) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 18 |