Religion, reason and non-directive teaching
A reply to Trevor Cooling
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20503196 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael Hand (0000-0002-1643-8213, University of Birmingham, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 79-85 |
| Publication date | 2014-01-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Beliefs and Values (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1361-7672 • E-ISSN: 1469-9362 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13617672.2014.884859 |
| OpenAlex | W1998554663 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 5 |
In other work I have argued that decisions about what to teach directively and what non-directively should be governed by an epistemic criterion. Trevor Cooling has recently advanced some objections to my defence and application of the epistemic criterion and proposed an alternative to it. Here I reply to his objections and comment on his proposed alternative
Directive · Epistemology · Computer Science · Engineering · Karl Barth and Christian Theology · Philosophy · Religion, Theology, and Education · Religious Education and Schools · Mechanical Engineering
Eği̇ti̇mde Tartişmali Konularin Seçi̇mi̇nde Kri̇ter Sorununun Felsefi̇ Temeli̇
Does a religious universalism haunt secular religious education
‘Moral dumbfounding’
Using forum theatre to address homosexuality as a controversial issue in religious education
Controversial issues in history teaching
Revisited
Teaching Controversial Issues
Reframing controversy
The role of teachers’ religious beliefs in their classroom practice – a personal or public concern
Assessment, Truth and Religious Studies
| Citations per year | 1.43 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Highly cited | No |