When it is ok to give the Robot Less
Children’s Fairness Intuitions Towards Robots
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21199136 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Oshrat Ayalon (0000-0002-5905-9838, Tel Aviv University, corresponding author), Hannah Hok (0000-0003-2902-4201, University of Chicago), Alex Shaw (0000-0002-8852-0179, University of Chicago), Goren Gordon (0000-0002-8351-7034, Tel Aviv University) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 9-10 |
| Pages | 1581-1601 |
| Publication date | 2023-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Social Robotics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1875-4791 • E-ISSN: 1875-4805 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s12369-023-01047-4 |
| OpenAlex | W4386896824 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 89 |
Children develop intuitions about fairness relatively early in development. While we know that children believe other humans care about distributional fairness, considerably less is known about whether they believe other agents, such as robots, do as well. In two experiments (N = 273) we investigated 4- to 9-year-old children’s intuitions about whether robots would be upset about unfair treatment as human children. Children were told about a scenario in which resources were being split between a human child and a target recipient: either another child or a robot across two conditions. The target recipient (either child or robot) received less than another child. They were then asked to evaluate how fair the distribution was, and whether the target recipient would be upset. Both Experiment 1 and 2 used the same design, but Experiment 2 also included a video demonstrating the robot’s mechanistic “robotic” movements. Our results show that children thought it was more fair to share unequally when the disadvantaged recipient was a robot rather than a child (Experiment 1 and 2). Furthermore, children thought that the child would be more upset than the robot (Experiment 2). Finally, we found that this tendency to treat these two conditions differently became stronger with age (Experiment 2). These results suggest that young children treat robots and children similarly in resource allocation tasks, but increasingly differentiate them with age. Specifically, children evaluate inequality as less unfair when the target recipient is a robot, and think that robots will be less angry about inequality
Cognitive psychology · Developmental psychology · Disadvantaged · Political science · Robot · Robotics · Child and Animal Learning Development · Computer Science · Law · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
Currency value moderates equity preference among young children
Applied Logistic Regression
Social robots for education
Children discard a resource to avoid inequity.
I Should but I Won’t
Mind Perception Is the Essence of Morality
The developmental roots of fairness: infants’ reactions to equal and unequal distributions of resources
Do Infants Have a Sense of Fairness?
Dimensions of Mind Perception
Holding Robots Responsible
Social evaluation by preverbal infants
“I had so much it didn’t seem fair”
The ontogeny of fairness in seven societies
Egalitarianism in young children
On seeing human
Most people are not Weird
Children’s Sense of Fairness as Equal Respect
Best practice guidance for linear mixed-effects models in psychological science
Investigating the nature of children's altruism using a social humanoid robot
It Does Not Matter Who You Are
The Interplay Between Emotional Intelligence, Trust, and Gender in Human–Robot Interaction
Foundations of cooperation in young children
Fairness perceptions of algorithmic decision-making
Examining the Diversity of Prosocial Behavior
Preschool Children's Anticipation of Recipients' Emotions Affects Their Resource Allocation
When Getting Something Good is Bad
Knowing what I should, doing what I want
Preschoolers distribute scarce resources according to the moral valence of recipients' previous actions
One for me, two for you
Child–robot interaction across cultures
Robovie, you'll have to go into the closet now
Can a Social Robot Stimulate Science Curiosity in Classrooms
Effects of form and motion on judgments of social robots׳ animacy, likability, trustworthiness and unpleasantness
How Robots Influence Humans
Would Children Help a Robot in Need
The developmental foundations of human fairness
Equity theory and the cognitive ability of children
Using Zoom Videoconferencing for Qualitative Data Collection
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |