Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Job Was Being Done

A Conversation About Dominika Macocha’s Video-sculptural Installation “50°31’29.7”N 22°46’39.1”E, 50°30’56.2”N 22°46’01.0”E, 50°30’41.0”N 22°45’49.5”E”

Bibliographic Data

ID21239616
AuthorsElżbieta Janicka (0000-0002-0945-6886, Polish Academy of Sciences), Konrad Matyjaszek (0000-0002-0236-4524, Polish Academy of Sciences), Xawery Stańczyk (0000-0003-0042-0016, Central Office of Measures), Katrin Stoll (0000-0001-9928-4880, Friedrich Schiller University Jena), Anna Zawadzka (0000-0002-6043-3321, Polish Academy of Sciences)
Year2020
Issue9
Publication date2020-12-31
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueStudia Litteraria et Historica (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2299-7571 • E-ISSN: 2299-7571
PublisherInstitute of Slavic Studies Polish Academy of Sciences (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.11649/slh.2368
OpenAlexW4200093565
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited3

This article is a record of a discussion concerning Dominika Macocha’s video-sculptural installation 50°31’29.7”N 22°46’39.1”E, 50°30’56.2”N 22°46’01.0”E, 50°30’41.0”N 22°45’49.5”E. The work deals with the uses of discourse and landscapes in mechanisms of camouflaging the crimes perpetrated on Jews by Poles during the Holocaust. The author lays bare and deconstructs these mechanisms – above all the mechanisms of narrative fetishism of production of artificial landscape – drawing on examples from Biłgoraj county. In the course of the discussion, the work inspired a critical reassessment of the categories dominating the ways in which the Holocaust is currently described: (1) Martin Pollack’s category of contaminated landscapes, rooted in the ideology of two totalitarianisms; (2) the category of the witness / bystander, which conceals the observers’ participation in the scenario of the crime; and (3) the category of taboo, which is ambivalent considering the universal knowledge on the part of local communities about what happened to Jews from their localities. Reflection on the production of taboo leads the discussants to deliberate on the status of Jewish sources in the field of Holocaust studies. Collected since as early as the 1940s, and containing ample and detailed information about Polish crimes perpetrated on Jews, they are nevertheless not recognised as sources by Polish historians. The conversation is concluded by an attempt at recapitulating the present condition of Polish historiography in the light of the postulated new approach to sources

Aesthetics · Ambivalence · Archaeology · Art · Conversation · Historiography · Ideology · Judaism · Literature · Narrative · Political science · Politics · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Taboo · The Holocaust · Witness · Anthropology · Central European Literary Studies · Communication · History · Law · Polish Historical and Cultural Studies · Polish-Jewish Holocaust Memory Studies · Psychology

  • Earth After Death

    Open Access•Melanie Mroz, Matilda Mroz•Studies in World Cinema•2023

  • Things Turned Out the Way They Did

    Open Access•Xawery Stańczyk•Studia Litteraria et Historica•2020

  • The Catholic-National Cauldron

    Open Access•Dominika Macocha•Studia Litteraria et Historica•2021

  • Obserwatorzy uczestniczący zamiast świadków i rama zamiast obrzeży. O nowe kategorie opisu polskiego kontekstu Zagłady

    Open Access•Elżbieta Janicka•Teksty Drugie•2018

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2020 - 2023 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae