Introduction to Lexical constraints in grammar
Minority verb classes and restricted alternations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21239722 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Katherine Walker (0000-0002-4600-4184, University of Amsterdam), Pegah Faghiri (0000-0001-9121-6330, University of Amsterdam, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2023-12-20 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Open Linguistics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2300-9969 • E-ISSN: 2300-9969 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/opli-2022-0271 |
| OpenAlex | W4389988472 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 41 |
This is an introduction to the Special Issue Lexical constraints in grammar: Minority verb classes and restricted alternations. In many languages, grammatical relations are subject to lexical constraints. These constraints can be manifested in different morphosyntactic domains, for instance, through deviation from canonical case frames or different argument indexation patterns. Other constructions that have been studied through this lens are voice and valency constructions and some clause-combining constructions. The types of oppositions established by lexical constraints vary: some absolute restrictions entail the obligatory presence or absence of a grammatical marker, while others entail the ability of a lexical item to alternate. In the latter instance, differences in the statistical preferences for one construction over another may be observed. In some cases, verb classes can be easily identified based on a common semantic feature; however, various other factors can also lead to the formation of minority verb classes and restrictions on alternations. This article introduces a collection of four articles investigating lexical constraints in a variety of morphosyntactic domains, adopting different perspectives and methodologies. It sets out a framework for considering different opposition types formed by the differing behaviour of different verb classes and outlines a number of different factors that motivate the formation of verb classes. This introductory article shows that lexical constraints provide fertile ground for typologists adopting a token-based approach seeking to compare languages at ever-greater levels of specification
Causative · Construction Grammar · Emergent grammar · Generative grammar · Grammar · Lexical density · Lexical functional grammar · Lexical grammar · Lexical item · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Relational grammar · Valency · Verb · Computer Science · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation · Artificial Intelligence
Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar
Argument indexing
Verb-second word order after German weil ‘because’
Chechen and Ingush
The Diachronic Typology of Non-Canonical Subjects
Lexical restrictions on grammatical relations in voice and valency constructions
Verb-based restrictions on noun incorporation across languages
A corpus-based analysis of P indexing in Ruuli (Bantu, JE103)
Bi-absolutive constructions in Chechen
Fluidity in argument indexing in Komnzo
Lexically driven patterns of contact in alignment systems of languages of the northern Upper Amazon
Tense-aspect conditioned agent marking in Kanakanavu, an Austronesian language of Taiwan
Restrictions on past-tense passives in Late Modern Danish
Differential indexing in Kamang
Semantic role clustering
Predicting voice choice in symmetrical voice languages
Variation in pronominal indexing
Argument indexing in Kamang
Kamang
Desintegration und Interpretation
Crosslinguistic Corpus Studies in Linguistic Typology
Remarks on transitivity
Extending collostructional analysis
Conditions on pronominal marking in the Alor-Pantar languages
Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |