Understanding risk evaluation practices in buying, cooking, and consuming pork in relation to Taenia solium taeniosis

A qualitative study in rural farming communities in Tanzania

Bibliographic Data

ID21257888
AuthorsKaren Schou Møller (0000-0001-7920-2622, University of Copenhagen, corresponding author), Thy (0000-0001-7936-3194, Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement), Séverine Thys (Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement), Sarah Gabriël (0000-0002-2523-233X, University of Copenhagen), Stig Milan Thamsborg (0000-0003-3304-7422, University of Copenhagen, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume5
Pages100385
Publication date2024-06-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSSM - Qualitative Research in Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2667-3215 • E-ISSN: 2667-3215
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100385
OpenAlexW4392435075
LanguageEN
References cited34

Pork cook risk evaluation is two-dimensional and influences the management of pork. • One risk evaluation dimension is theoretical; the other is experienced. • Risk evaluation is acted and embedded into everyday situations of handling pork. • Knowledge does not necessarily entail behavioural change. • Inclusion of a deep understanding of context in intervention studies is essential

Agriculture · Business · Cysticercosis · Environmental health · Geography · Qualitative research · Social science · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Taenia solium · Tanzania · Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology · Mathematics · Medicine · Nursing · Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding · Psychology · Marketing